Blog

Tax News & Views AI and Paper Clips Weekly Roundup

By Alex M. Parker
May 29, 2026
George Washington on a dollar bill.

Key Takeaways

  • Senator ignites debate on AI and data center taxes.
  • IRS issues relief on sovereign wealth funds.
  • Commenters bring the heat on fuel credit ambiguity.
  • NYT has a deep dive on new corporate public disclosures of global tax payments.
  • "Blue Book" on One Big Beautiful Bill Act is out, just in time for summer.
  • National Paper Clip Day!

AI Taxes Coming?

Why We Need to Tax AI - Sen. Elizabeth Warren, TIME Magazine:

Rethinking our tax code must also include going to the source: that means taxing AI companies directly, which can start with taxing AI data centers. The majority of AI data centers are controlled or operated by trillion-dollar companies. By imposing a reasonable excise tax on the energy used by data centers, families could recoup some of the gains of AI, while America continues to stay competitive in the AI race. A well-designed tax would focus on the companies that can afford it and scale with AI’s impact: the bigger the data center, the more they pay.

We can't be afraid to consider even bigger and bolder proposals to tax AI too, including ideas that sound radical today but may quickly become common sense. Because here’s what I see clearly: if we overhaul our tax code and tax AI, we can use that money to build a country that works for everyone. A country where health care is treated as a human right, where every American is guaranteed a good job, and where education isn’t a privilege reserved for the wealthy. That’s what I believe taxing AI promises.

 

Elizabeth Warren’s AI plan is the same as her plan for everything else - Washington Post Editorial Board:

In a world where the United States punishes AI with taxation and regulation, its world-leading position in the industry would erode. Fewer workers would reap its benefits, and they would be paid less. And politicians would begin to complain about how the benefits of AI aren’t being shared.

The reason would be the government’s own policies that ensured there would be less to go around, but that wouldn’t matter. The politicians’ solution would be some kind of government incentives to spur more AI investment and adoption.

 

Ohio Governor Pauses Data Center Tax Breaks - Maria Koklanaris, Law360 Tax Authority ($):

Ohio became the most recent state to signal the growing unease in giving tax breaks to data centers as Gov. Mike DeWine said he directed the state tax credit authority to pause consideration of any new exemption requests.

On Wednesday, DeWine, a Republican, said he told the chair of the Ohio Tax Credit Authority to wait on any new requests for tax breaks while a General Assembly committee examines the growth of data centers in the state.

DeWine's move came in light of the Ohio Department of Taxation reporting that the state had about $1.6 billion in 2025 forgone sales tax revenue because of the tax breaks, whereas the state had projected that it would have about $136 million.
 
 
IRS Regulations

Treasury Reg Revision Helps Sovereign-Wealth Investors in US - Michael Rapoport, Bloomberg Tax ($):

The Treasury Department and the IRS moved Friday to address concerns that sovereign-wealth funds and other foreign-government investors in the US could be penalized by new regulations on when their US investment income is exempt from US taxation.

Treasury and the IRS proposed new regulations that would “grandfather in” existing investments so that they won’t be subject to aspects of foreign-government income regulations under Section 892 that were proposed in December.

The proposed change is a response to “the concerns of many taxpayers” and aims to “support current and future sovereign wealth fund investment in the United States,” IRS CEO Frank Bisignano said in a statement.

 

Safe Harbor Ambiguity Seen as Clouding Clean Fuel Credit - Mary Katherine Browne, Tax Notes ($):

Industry representatives told Treasury and the IRS that ambiguities in the proposed clean fuel production credit's safe harbor provisions are leaving producers unable to claim credits, structure transfers, or comply with confidence.

During a May 28 public hearing on the proposed regulations (REG-121244-23) for the section 45Z credit, witnesses representing the fuel production and agricultural sectors urged Treasury and the IRS to resolve safe harbor ambiguities, clarify supply chain verification requirements, and retract a process fuel prohibition they said exceeds the agency's statutory authority.

Established by the Inflation Reduction Act, the section 45Z credit amount is 20 cents per gallon for nonsustainable aviation fuel and 35 cents per gallon for sustainable aviation fuel. For facilities that satisfy the prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements, the credit jumps to $1 per gallon for nonsustainable aviation fuel.
 

See Eide Bailly Business Credits and Incentives for more in this area.

 

Another Tax Bill Still Possible?

Hill Staff Say Bipartisan Tax Deal Could Still Happen - Macon Atkinson and Chris Cioffi, Bloomberg Tax ($):

Capitol Hill tax staff haven’t ruled out an end-of-year bipartisan tax package to adjust retirement fixes and international tax issues that have gone unaddressed—even as Republican lawmakers race against the clock to pass a “skinny” reconciliation package.

Ji Prichard, tax counsel for House Ways and Means Committee Democrats, said there was appetite for a bipartisan bill that builds on previous efforts like the 2022 SECURE 2.0 retirement law, which included a saver’s match and changes to the Thrift Savings Plan. 
  

 

Global Tax Intrigue

Trump Clears Way for Corporate Tax Dodge Hidden in the Fine Print - Jesse Drucker and Dylan Freedman, The New York Times:

A year ago, the Trump administration withdrew from a global effort to curb offshore tax-dodging by multinational companies. That decision has been a huge gift to corporate America, enabling companies to avoid at least $40 billion in income taxes since the beginning of 2025.

A New York Times review of securities filings from nearly 500 companies showed that they avoided taxes by attributing hundreds of billions of dollars in earnings to low- or no-tax foreign locales like Cyprus, Bermuda, Switzerland and the Cayman Islands. Often, corporations funneled the profits through subsidiaries in places where they had no employees, offices or customers. 

Tax experts might quibble with the cause-and-effect implied here--the Trump executive order signaled the direction of administrative policy, but only Congress could have fully applied the OECD's minimum tax. Under both presidents Biden and Trump, it has so far declined to do so.

 

Speaking of the OECD...

OECD Teases New Global Tax Safe Harbors in Updated Guidance - Ryan Hogg, Bloomberg Tax ($):

The OECD incorporated details from its landmark January agreement on a global minimum tax into its consolidated commentary Thursday and indicated further amendments are coming to various parts of the framework.

The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development added new details to its Consolidated Commentary to the Global Anti-Base-Erosion Model Rules from the last update in May 2025, reflecting the publication of the Side-by-Side Package.

As part of the OECD Inclusive Framework’s two-pillar framework addressing the tax challenges arising from the digitalization of the global economy, member jurisdictions agreed to tax large multinationals a minimum 15% corporate income tax wherever they book income. 

 

Italy’s Finance Police Focus on Influencers, Online Tax Evasion - Matteo Rizzi, Tax Notes ($):

Switzerland will face competitive challenges in attracting US multinationals under the OECD-led revised global minimum tax framework, a Swiss tax official warned Thursday.

US companies operating in Switzerland must still pay the country’s 15% minimum tax under the agreement, but they can avoid it by relocating to countries that haven’t implemented a similar measure, which could disadvantage the country, said Marc-Antoine Bree, project manager for tax policy at Switzerland’s Federal Tax Administration. 
  

Eide Bailly International Tax.

 

Background on Gas Tax Breaks

From Carter’s Hike to Trump’s Holiday: The Changing Politics of the Gas Tax - Joseph J. Thorndike, Tax Notes ($):

It’s easy to see what’s driving the latest push to suspend the gas tax. Gasoline prices are visible, immediate, and politically unforgiving. There hasn’t been much polling on current tax holiday proposals, but the surrounding politics are plain enough. In late March, the Pew Research Center found that gas prices were top of mind for Americans in both parties; 79 percent of Democrats and 59 percent of Republicans reported being “extremely” or “very” concerned about fuel prices in the wake of the Iran war. A tax holiday speaks directly to that anxiety, promising visible relief.

Important caveat: Only part of the savings from a gas tax holiday is likely to show up in the form of lower pump prices. “Consumers would see roughly 60 to 72 percent of the tax savings at the pump,” according to the Penn Wharton Budget Model, “with the remainder captured by suppliers."

 

 

Weaponization Fund Fallout

State Dems race to tax payouts from Trump's 'anti-weaponization' fund - Bernie Becker, Nick Reisman, Shia Kapos, Tyler Katzenberger and Daniel Han, Politico:

State lawmakers are working together and sharing legislative text in hopes of levying a 100 percent income tax on any payments from the $1.8 billion fund, created through the settlement of President Donald Trump’s lawsuit against the IRS. And their governors are taking interest, with California Gov. Gavin Newsom endorsing the proposal Wednesday and New York’s Kathy Hochul signaling Thursday she’d be open to it as well.

“I have no problem with there being consequences for people who accept that money,” Hochul told reporters.

Democrats have been accusing Trump of using the Oval Office to fill the wallets of his family and friends for months now. The new barrage of tax proposals, however, shows that few of the president’s actions have whipped up this much anger among Democrats — from lawmakers accusing the administration of setting up a “slush fund” for people who participated in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol, to Bruce Springsteen pausing his three-hour concert in Washington on Wednesday night to call the fund “an American outrage.” Along with California and New York, similar proposals have cropped up in Illinois and New Jersey, with more states expected to follow.
 

 

Blogs & Bits

Just in time for summer beach reading, the Joint Committee on Taxation released its "General Explanations" of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act's tax provisions--often called the "Blue Book." The report outlines potential technical corrections to the bill, but don't expect Congress to act swiftly in the current climate.

Speaking of the hardworking scorekeepers, William McBride of the Tax Foundation takes a moment to praise the Congressional Budget Office for providing "the most comprehensive, rigorous, and up-to-date analysis" of the economy and national debt situation.

And Kay Bell of Don't Mess With Taxes on the new IRS apps for the OBBBA's Trump Accounts.

 

Check out our International and State/Local roundups for more of this week's tax news.

 

What day is it?

paper clips

It's National Paper Clip Day! Even if you never use them anymore, take a moment to remember this useful item--if only so kids will know what the "Attach" icon means.

Make a habit of sustained success.
Every organization deserves to realize its full potential. Let us help you find yours.
Learn More

About the Author(s)

Alex Parker
Alex Parker
Tax Legislative Affairs Director
Alex provides on-the-ground coverage and analysis of tax developments in our nation's capital, ensuring that Eide Bailly clients are well-informed about legal or regulatory changes that could affect them. He also closely follows the fast-changing and complex international tax sphere, including new projects at the United Nations, the G-20, and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

Any opinions expressed or implied are those of the author and not necessarily those of Eide Bailly. Opinions found in linked items are those of the authors of the linked item, not of your bloggers or of Eide Bailly. “$” means link may be behind a paywall. Items here do not constitute tax advice.