Blog

State Tax News and Views: The Carrots-and-Sticks Edition

Melissa Menter and Colette Sutton
Updated on April 16, 2026
Carrots

Key Takeaways

  • LA's Taxation of SaaS Creates Complexity at Parish Level
  • IN Tax Amnesty
  • ME Includes Millionaire's Tax In Budget
  • OR Extends PTET Election
  • State Disaster Relief is a Disaster

Welcome to this edition of our roundup of state tax developments. The State Tax News and Views is published weekly. Consider the Eide Bailly State & Local Tax team for your state tax planning, compliance and incentive needs.

States are reaching for the familiar carrots and sticks this spring-but not always handing them out evenly. Some are offering generous incentives to shape taxpayer behavior, while others are narrowing exemptions or looking for new revenue sources. At the same time, courts continue to weigh in, reminding tax agencies that policy goals still have legal limits. 

This week's state and local tax developments reflect that balance. From data center tax incentives facing continued scrutiny, to legislative debates over who should bear the tax burden, to court decisions reinforcing federal and statutory limits on state taxing authority, one thing is constant: states are offering rewards, serving up penalties, and testing the edges of their authority - but they don't always get the final say.

 

Carrots and Sticks: When States Use Taxes to Steer Decisions

States continue to use tax policy as both an incentive and a deterrent. Recent developments highlight how aggressive these efforts can be - and how varied the approaches remain across jurisdictions.

Do Sports Wager Tax Rates Affect Betting Volume? - Matthew Knittel and Robyn Toth, Tax Notes ($):

Legalized sports wagering has expanded rapidly across states. Thirty-four states offer legal sports wagering, and most (30) allow wagers to be made using a mobile device.1 State tax rates range from 6.75 percent of gross gambling revenue (bets retained by operators) in Nevada and Iowa to 50 percent (Delaware, Illinois) and 51 percent (New York, Rhode Island, Oregon, and New Hampshire).2 Given the wide variation in state tax rates, does the Laffer curve concept apply to this revenue source, and if so, is there a revenue-maximizing tax rate?3

 INDIANA 

Indiana Announces 2026 Tax Amnesty - Melissa Menter, Eide Bailly:

Indiana published guidance on the upcoming tax amnesty program, which will run from July 15 through September 9, 2026.

Individuals and businesses with outstanding tax liabilities for tax periods ending before Jan. 1, 2024 may be eligible to participate, provided they did not participate in prior tax amnesty programs. Taxpayers with an INTIME account will be able to look up their eligible tax liabilities beginning May 18, 2026.

To participate, taxpayers must either:

  • Pay eligible liabilities in full prior to September 9, 2026, or
  • Enter into a payment plan and complete payment by June 7, 2027.

Upon completion, the Department of Revenue will waive any related interest, penalties and collection fees.

 RHODE ISLAND 

Rhode Island DOR Proposes Regulation Establishing Non-Owner-Occupied Property Tax- Bloomberg Tax ($):

The Rhode Island Department of Revenue (DOR) has proposed a new regulation implementing the Non-Owner-Occupied Property Tax, which would impose a statewide tax on residential properties valued at $1 million or more that are not occupied by their owners for at least 183 days during the privilege year. The tax, set at $2.50 per $500 of assessed value exceeding the $1 million threshold. The rule would take effect for tax years beginning on or after July 1, with exemptions available for properties rented for 183 days or more during the privilege year.

 UTAH 

Tilting at Social Media Windmills in Utah - Billy Hamilton, Tax Notes ($):

On March 25 Utah Gov. Spencer Cox (R) signed S.B. 287, which imposes a 4.7 percent tax on the digital advertising revenue of large social media companies. The legislation targets companies with more than $1 million in Utah ad revenue and $100 million in global targeted ad revenue.1 State Sen. Michael McKell (R), the bill’s sponsor, said his legislation would punish practices that treat kids’ attention “like an asset to be extracted, optimized and sold.”2 Money raised by the tax would fund a range of youth-oriented programs, mental health services for young people, and public awareness regarding the effects of the ads on viewers.

Cox signed another bill, S.B. 73, on March 19, which imposes a 2 percent tax on online providers of material that is “harmful to minors” — meaning sites containing pornographic content. Also signed just ahead of the statutory deadline was S.B. 162, which closes a sales tax loophole for streaming services by clarifying that all digital content — including streamed and downloaded video, audio, books, and gambling — is subject to the state’s sales and use tax.3

 

More States Jump Into the Data Center Tax Break Debate

As data centers continue to appear in the news, states are reassessing whether generous tax incentives still deliver the promised economic benefits. Several legislatures are now scaling back or eliminating these exemptions in response to cost, energy, and revenue concerns.

 NEBRASKA 

Nebraska Law Eliminates Data Center Exemptions - Emily Hollingsworth, Tax Notes ($):

L.B. 901 eliminates a sales tax exemption and a personal property tax exemption for data center equipment assembled in the state for use at a data center that operates outside Nebraska. The sales tax exemption will be repealed as of July 1 and the personal property tax exemption will be repealed by January 1, 2027.

L.B. 901 also allows the Department of Revenue to charge several new collection and assessment fees to fund the department's enforcement efforts.

 NORTH CAROLINA 

NC Gov. Calls for Overhaul of Data Center Tax Breaks - Maria Koklanaris, Law360 ($):

North Carolina would be the latest state to consider an overhaul of its tax breaks for data centers if Democratic Gov. Josh Stein has his way.

Stein told his task force on energy policy Wednesday that the special tax exemptions North Carolina has for data centers are too costly and should be reduced or eliminated. The tax breaks, which provide data centers with sales and use tax exemptions if they invest at least $75 million, are no longer needed in their current form, the governor said. 

 WASHINGTON 

Washington Trims Sales Tax Break for Data Centers - Paul Jones, Tax Notes ($):

Washington’s governor has signed legislation repealing a sales tax exemption for data center refurbishment.

On April 1 Gov. Bob Ferguson (D) approved S.B. 6231, which eliminates the tax break in order to shore up revenue for the state.

 

Drawing the Lines: Who Pays, What's Taxed, and What Gets Relief

States are continuing to redraw the boundaries of their tax systems by refining exemptions, imposing targeted surcharges, and clarifying who qualifies for relief. Recent developments show how these line-drawing exercises can significantly shift tax outcomes for specific taxpayers and industries. 

 ARKANSAS 

Appeals Court Rejects Arkansas Hospital's Exemption Argument - Caitlin Mullaney, Tax Notes ($):

A nonprofit Arkansas hospital group cannot claim a tax exemption for portions of the hospital property occupied by a physician group that does not operate as a charity, the state appeals court has held.

In an April 1 decision in Baptist Memorial Hospital — Jonesboro Inc. v. Towell, Judge Wendy Scholtens Wood of the Arkansas Court of Appeals found that the portion of Baptist Memorial Hospital — Jonesboro Inc.'s (NEA Hospital's) property that was leased to a Northeast Arkansas Clinic Charitable Foundation Inc. (NEA Clinic) physician practice group did not qualify for a property tax exemption.

 MAINE 

Maine Budget Adopts Millionaire's Tax - Emily Hollingsworth, Tax Notes ($):

Maine has enacted an income tax surcharge for taxpayers with more than $1 million in income.

The tax was approved under supplemental budget bill L.D. 2212, signed by Gov. Janet Mills (D) April 10. The budget also expands a property tax credit program and phases in conformity with the federal deduction for domestic research and experimental expenses and the expanded federal standard deduction.

[...]

L.D. 2212 imposes a 2 percent income tax surcharge on the portion of income exceeding $1 million for single filers and over $1.5 million for joint and head of household filers.

 OREGON 

Oregon Governor Signs SALT Cap Workaround Extension - Paul Jones, Tax Notes ($):

Oregon’s governor has signed legislation extending through 2027 the state’s passthrough entity workaround to the federal cap on the state and local tax deduction.

The legislation also updates a reference to the federal tax code to ensure that Oregon continues to tax foreign income that was designated as net controlled foreign corporation tested income by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (P.L. 119-21).

 

Advocacy for State Disaster Tax Relief - Brian Myers, Mo Bell-Jacobs, and Ning Yim, The Tax Adviser:

At present, there is a lack of uniformity in state–level tax relief provided in response to federally declared disasters, making it challenging for taxpayers operating in multiple states to navigate varying tax relief provisions. Currently, nine states (Alaska, Florida, Indiana, Massachusetts, New Jersey, North Carolina, North Dakota, Utah, and Wisconsin) have enacted legislation or issued binding regulations to automatically follow or allow an extension based on the federal disaster tax relief (or allow for an extension based on what the federal disaster relief offers generally for corporate income tax purposes).

[...]

The remaining 41 states,1 plus the District of Columbia and one local jurisdiction (New York City) do not make it clear that taxpayers can rely on binding state disaster tax relief, due to the absence of clear laws or regulations.

[...]

Because of the lack of uniformity in state tax disaster relief provisions, it has become extremely burdensome for taxpayers doing business in multiple states to track the different disaster tax relief provisions across the states, given the varying treatment.

 

Limits on State Taxing Authority

Even as states push to expand their taxing reach, courts continue to reinforce statutory and federal limits on that authority. Recent decisions show where state tax agencies may have gone too far.

 LOUISIANA 

Louisiana Tax Appeals Board Vacates Assessment, Holds Military Spouse May Elect Domicile Under MSRRA - Bloomberg Tax ($):

The Louisiana Board of Tax Appeals vacated the notice of assessment for individual income tax issued against the taxpayer, finding that the taxpayer was entitled to claim Texas as her domicile under the Military Spouses Residency Relief Act (MSRRA).

 NEW JERSEY 

Wayfair Doesn't Buoy NJ's 86-272 Rules, Biz Group Argues - Paul Williams, Law360 ($):

New Jersey's tax agency incorrectly relied on U.S. Supreme Court sales tax precedent to support regulations outlining when a company's internet activities exceed P.L. 86-272's federal protections against state income taxes, a business trade group argued in the state Tax Court.

[...]

The trade group was responding to arguments that the New Jersey Division of Taxation made in a brief last month invoking the Wayfair decision, which overturned precedent requiring businesses to be physically located in a state to be required to collect and remit sales tax. The division asked the court to dismiss the ACMA's challenge to the rules, but the association countered that the division was attempting to "change the meaning" of P.L. 86-272 through the regulations.

 TEXAS 

American Airlines Wins Fight With Texas Over Franchise Tax - Michael Nunes, Law360 ($):

The Texas comptroller's office wrongly levied franchise tax on American Airlines' baggage fee revenue, a state appeals court ruled, upholding a refund for the airline after finding a federal law barred how the state sought to tax the company.

In an opinion released Thursday, a panel for the Fifteenth Court of Appeals said the state's franchise tax, as applied to certain American revenue, functioned as a tax on gross receipts from air commerce or air transportation, which is prohibited under the federal Anti-Head Tax Act. The court upheld a refund of $108,000 in franchise tax assessed against the company stemming from roughly $1 billion in baggage fee revenue in 2015.

SEASONED WITH SALT

   Tax Tips, Tricks and Opportunities   

Parish-Level Complexity Emerges from Louisiana's SaaS Sales Tax - Scott McCrillis, Eide Bailly:

Louisiana’s decision to expand its sales tax to include Software as a Service (“SaaS”) and certain digital products, effective January 1, 2025, has added a new layer of complexity for businesses operating in the State. Under La. Rev. Stat. Ann. §47:301.3(9), charges for access to prewritten computer software—like SaaS subscriptions—are subject to state sales tax. While this brings Louisiana in line with other states that tax digital products, it also means that companies must pay close attention to how these rules apply to their operations.

What makes Louisiana unique is that each local parish has the authority to set and administer its own local sales tax rules and regulations. Even though the state has tried to make things easier by offering a centralized system for collecting sales tax, participation by parishes is voluntary. As a result, some parishes fully tax SaaS and digital services while others partially tax these items or take a narrower view. Several parishes have issued no formal guidance at all. This means that SaaS providers and customers need to check not only the state’s tax rules, but also the specific requirements in each parish where their services are used. With 64 parishes, each potentially having different definitions, rates, and exemptions, the compliance landscape can quickly become complicated.

For businesses, the varied landscape of local regulations means that extending sales tax to SaaS involves more than simply applying the state rate. Companies must closely monitor where services are delivered and ensure compliance with specific local tax requirements in each parish. Until Louisiana adopts a more standardized statewide system, organizations should anticipate ongoing compliance complexities and maintain robust risk management protocols when engaging in SaaS transactions within the state.

Make a habit of sustained success.

Every organization deserves to realize its full potential. Let us help you find yours.
Learn More

About the Author(s)

Melissa Menter Photo

Melissa Menter

Senior Manager
Melissa has over 20 years of experience helping clients with a broad range of tax issues. She has both Big Four and in-house Fortune 500 corporate tax experience, which gives her the perspective of being able to see a problem and its possible solutions from multiple angles. Melissa is a creative thinker and enjoys crafting customized, practical solutions to complex tax problems.
Colette Sutton

Colette Sutton

Senior Associate
Colette is a member of Eide Bailly’s State and Local Tax (SALT) Services team, where she specializes in assisting clients with complex state and local tax matters. Her primary focus is on tax controversy engagements, income and franchise tax audits, nexus determinations, and taxability studies. Colette brings a thoughtful and strategic approach to resolving disputes and navigating multi-state tax challenges. She also has experience with sales and use tax, giving her a well-rounded perspective on a wide range of SALT matters. 

Any opinions expressed or implied are those of the author and not necessarily those of Eide Bailly. Opinions found in linked items are those of the authors of the linked item, not of your bloggers or of Eide Bailly. “$” means link may be behind a paywall. Items here do not constitute tax advice.