Blog

Tax News & Views Chocolate Covered Regulation Roundup

By Joe Kristan
December 16, 2025
Chocolate Fondue

Key Takeaways

  • No ACA enhanced credit this year.
  • Lenders puzzle over car loan reporting.
  • Final regs clarify treatment of tribal benefits.
  • Tax Court: no jury needed for accuracy penalties.
  • Administration digs in on stopping tariff refunds.
  • What $100 buys around the country.
  • No records, but some nice cars.
  • National Chocolate Covered Anything Day.

Legislative Update Today! The next Eide Bailly Quarterly Legislative Update webinar is today, December 16, at Noon Central Time. Our Alex Parker will cover the (in)action in Congress and what we can expect when the calendar turns. Register here!

 

House GOP’s health care week goes awry - Jake Sherman, Laura Weiss, John Bresnahan and Andrew Desiderio, Punchbowl News:

This week — the last of the legislative year — was designed to give House Republicans a way to push back on Democratic attacks that they’re indifferent to skyrocketing health care costs hitting millions of Americans.

Instead, the House GOP leadership has facilitated an untimely — and particularly nasty — intraparty brawl, pitting moderates against Republican Party leaders and further strengthening Democrats’ political hand as the Obamacare cliff looms.

Speaker Mike Johnson and his inner circle are pushing moderate Republicans like Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick (Pa.), Mike Lawler (N.Y.), David Valadao (Calif.) and Jen Kiggans (Va.) into the arms of Democrats, as the House Republican leadership refuses to allow the centrists a vote on extending the enhanced Obamacare premium subsidies.

 

Senators Scramble for Health Subsidy Solution as Time Runs Out - Steven Dennis and Erik Wasson, Bloomberg ($):

Maine Republican Senator Susan Collins, who’s part of the bipartisan talks, said a vote could happen as soon as early next year. That, she added, could trigger a new or expanded open enrollment period in early 2026 for people using the Obamacare health insurance exchanges.

The political uncertainty surrounding the future of the Covid-era subsidies complicates matters for millions of consumers facing out-of-pocket costs doubling or more if lawmakers can’t agree on a path forward. The current open enrollment period expires Jan. 15.

With just weeks to go until the subsidies expire, and days until lawmakers are scheduled to leave for the Christmas holiday, there’s little momentum building for a straight extension — and no sign that a compromise could get written into bill form and passed through the House and Senate in time to avoid premiums spiking.

 

Reporting the Car Loan Deduction

Banks, Credit Unions Grapple With Auto Loan Tax Break Reporting - Erin Slowey, Bloomberg ($):

The GOP’s multitrillion dollar tax-and-spending law made it so certain taxpayers in 2025 through 2028 can deduct up to $10,000 in car loan interest for eligible vehicles purchased in those years. The law also established reporting requirements for lenders that receive individual interest of $600 or more on certain loans.

While lenders are required to report interest for loans that were made starting at the beginning of this year, it is still unclear whether the lender needs to determine the buyer’s eligibility for the car loan interest tax benefit.

If lenders don’t need to make that determination, it could put more of the burden on the car buyer to determine if they qualify for the lucrative break.

 

Tribal Benefits Get Clarity From Final Rules

Native American Tribal Benefits and Entity Tax Regs Finalized - Trevor Sykes, Tax Notes ($):

Final regulations detail the federal tax classification of wholly owned Native American tribal business entities and the requirements for determining the gross income exclusions of certain tribal general welfare benefits.

The final regs concerning wholly owned tribal business entities (T.D. 10039) provide long-sought guidance establishing that business entities fully owned by tribal governments and organized or incorporated under the relevant tribal laws aren’t recognized as separate entities for federal tax purposes.

The second set of final regs (T.D. 10040) addressed previous calls from tribal leaders and members to fully enact tax-favored treatment of Native American tribal general welfare benefits.

 

IRS Finalizes Tribal Welfare, Energy Direct Pay Rules - Kat Lucero, Law360 Tax Authority ($):

The welfare regulations confirm that certain spending tied to tribal programs that assist tribes' members and families are excluded from taxable income, according to U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.

...

Native American communities have been waiting for the finalized version of the welfare regulations since the enactment of the Tribal General Welfare Exclusion Act of 2014. The law created IRC Section 139Eto exclude such welfare benefits from taxable income if they meet specified requirements, including that they are not lavish or extravagant and do not constitute compensation for services.

The regulations confirmed what prior IRS guidance said on the tax treatment of tribal welfare benefits, including Revenue Procedure 2014-35, which was issued before the 2014 law's enactment. They also expand on prior guidance, including giving tribes deference to interpret ambiguities in Section 139E. This deference is based on feedback from tribes and other stakeholders, according to the IRS. 

 

Watchdog Slams IRS Response to Puerto Rico Tax Dodges

Audit Faults IRS for Slow Progress on Tax Cheats in Puerto Rico - Michael Bologna, Bloomberg ($):

The Government Accountability Office released an audit examining IRS oversight of taxpayers seeking refuge under Puerto Rico’s Act 60. The 2019 statute lures wealthy individuals and businesses to the island with promises of total or near-total tax exemptions.

The IRS announced a compliance campaign in 2021 to address concerns that some transplants were evading tax obligations on income that should be sourced to the US. But GAO faulted the agency for procedural failures and for failing to coordinate with Puerto Rico’s tax agency, Departmento de Hacienda de Puerto Rico.

“The IRS campaign was slow to demonstrate results, in part due to the complexity of high-income, high-wealth audits,” GAO auditors wrote. “In addition, IRS did not prioritize this effort and communication gaps between IRS and Hacienda left the campaign without key data on the taxpayer population for more than 4 years.”

 

No Jury Trial for Tax Accuracy Penalties

Seventh Amendment Inapplicable to Accuracy Penalties, Court Says - Kristen Parillo, Tax Notes ($):

The Tax Court has the authority to adjudicate accuracy-related penalties without a jury trial, it held in a precedential opinion that expands on a previous ruling the court issued regarding civil fraud penalties.

Accuracy-related penalties imposed under section 6662 fall within the public rights exception to the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial, Tax Court Judge Kathleen Kerrigan wrote in a December 15 division opinion in Riddle Aggregates LLC v. Commissioner.

...

The partnership asserted that the court should hold that the accuracy-related penalties aren’t assessable as a matter of law and redetermine the penalties to be zero. Riddle cited as support the Supreme Court’s 2024 decision in SEC v. Jarkesy, 603 U.S. 109 (2024), which held that the SEC’s imposition of civil penalties for securities fraud in proceedings before an administrative law judge violated the Seventh Amendment because there was no opportunity to demand a jury trial.

 

Administration Looks to Thwart Tariff Refunds

Trump’s DOJ digs in on tariff refunds - Ari Hawkins, Politico:

The Trump administration asked a federal court to reject a request from dozens of companies seeking to suspend the final processing, or “liquidation,” of tariff payments, as importers race against deadlines that could affect their ability to secure refunds.

In a filing last week, the DOJ opposed a Thursday request from dozens of companies for an injunction to halt tariff processing ahead of a Supreme Court ruling on duties Trump imposed under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

...

But the administration did not explain whether — or how — companies not participating in litigation would be able to recover payments if the tariffs are struck down, suggesting it has no plans to ease the refund process.

 

TPC Shows Who Pays Trump Administration’s Tariffs And Who Could Gain From $2,000 Dividend - Janet Holtzblatt, Robert McClelland, and John Wong, TaxVox:

According to TPC, tariff policies in place as of December 4, 2025 will raise families’ federal tax burden by an average of $2,100 in 2026. Overall, the average federal tax rate will increase by 1.6 percentage points, up to 21 percent, and after-tax income will drop by 2.0 percent. In total, the tariff policies will yield $2.3 trillion in federal revenues from 2026 through 2035.

 

Trump Says Tariffs Have Brought in $18 Trillion. That's Impossible. - Eric Boehm, Reason, "Logically, getting $18 trillion in tariff revenue in a single year is impossible. The U.S. imported about $3.3 trillion of goods last year. You'd have to tax those imports at nearly 600 percent to get $18 trillion in new tariff revenue. Of course, if you taxed imports at that level, you'd end up with roughly the same amount of imports as tariff revenue: zero."

 

Hope for Tax Season?

Former Commissioners Cite IRS Staff for 2026 Filing Season Hope - Nathan Richman, Tax Notes ($):

The IRS’s turbulent year might not guarantee a particularly bad filing season in 2026, but the remaining staff will have to work harder to make up for the disruptions, according to two former IRS commissioners.

“I think filing season ’26 is going to be seamless, and I’m relying on the people of the IRS to make it happen,” former IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig said December 12 at an American Bar Association Section of Taxation conference in Las Vegas.

...

“If there’s 100 people managing the IRS filing season, they’re all going to do excellent work, and hard work, and they’re resilient, and they’re incredible, and they’re solution oriented. We’re going to have 80 people doing it, and those 80 people are going to kick butt, I know. I just wish there was 100 people,” former IRS Commissioner Daniel Werfel said. 

Werfel, who resigned in January, said the IRS isn’t ready to replace 20 percent of its workforce with automation and other technology tools.

 

$114.97 in Duluth, $100.15 in Boulder, $84.58 in San Francisco.

Purchasing Power: The Real Value of $100 by Metropolitan Area, 2023 - Erica York, Tax Foundation. "One hundred dollars tends to buy the least in large cities in the Northeast, California, and the Pacific Northwest. On the other hand, $100 goes the furthest in rural areas in the Southeast and Midwest."

 

 

Blogs and Bits

Tax Breaks: The It Could Happen To Anyone Edition - Kelly Phillips Erb, Forbes. " After the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017 changed the rules for personal casualty and theft losses, taxpayers who suffered financial losses due to a scam didn’t qualify for a deduction."

We Wish You an Arm’s Length Margin and a Happy Year End - Chad Martin, Eide Bailly. "As we approach that special time of year when we take a step back and reflect on the financial year we’re leaving behind, let’s spare some goodwill toward the year‑end transfer pricing adjustment." 

 

Taxpayer Prevails in Dispute With IRS Over Covid-Related Extension of Refund Deadline - Parker Tax Pro Library. "he Court of Federal Claims held that a taxpayer's lawsuit for a refund of penalties, which was filed more than two years after the IRS denied the taxpayer's requests for abatement, was nonetheless timely filed because the filing deadline was extended by Code Sec. 7508A as in effect for 2019. The court found that under the plain meaning of the 2019 version of the statute, the automatic extension ran from the beginning of the disaster declaration on January 20, 2020, through the end of the declared disaster period (May 11, 2023), and until 60 days after the end of the declared disaster period (July 10, 2023)."

The Disaster Related Extension of Deadlines Act (H.R. 1491) Sent to the President for Signature - Ed Zollars, Current Federal Tax Developments. "Under current law, a significant trap exists for taxpayers filing under disaster relief provisions. While IRC § 7508A allows the Secretary to disregard a period of up to one year for filing returns (a postponement), this postponement is not statutorily defined as an "extension" for purposes of the limitation on credits or refunds."

 

Shocking: State Taxes Matter to Hockey Players - Russ Fox, Taxable Talk. "Yes, there are other factors that come into play: family, the team you would be playing for (do you like the coach/staff, other players; the chance that you could win a Stanley Cup), and climate (another pro for all the cities noted above except Seattle) are three that immediately come to mind.  But the idea that taxes don’t influence decisions is laughable."

Related: Eide Bailly State and Local Tax Services.

 

The Corporation Bank Account Is Not Your Personal Account

Cash Business With Few Records Nets $9 Million Tax Liability - Chandra Wallace, Tax Notes ($). "The operator of an online business who paid suppliers in cash and failed to report millions of dollars he pocketed from it couldn’t duck the resulting taxes, the Tax Court held."

The Tax Court opinion reads like a case study in bad recordkeeping and bad tax habits. There are no accounting records, to speak of. The taxpayer treated corporate accounts as personal accounts. The taxpayer used corporate accounts to pay business expenses. And the taxpayer tried to claim tax payments as "cost of goods sold" with no substantiation for what was purchased.

Given the lack of records, the IRS reconstructed income using taxpayer bank records. This rarely goes well for taxpayers, and it went badly here (Taxpayer name and IRS examiner name are omitted in favor of "Petitioner" and "Examiner." Emphasis is mine, and I omit citations. "ONY Sales" is the corporation.):

Examiner reconstructed their income using the bank deposits method... These records establish that Examiners received, but did not report, income for the years in issue. Examiners argue that the bank accounts were ONY Sales’, not Examiners’, and ONY Sales was not owned by Petitioner. But we have found above that Petitioner ran the business, had control over the business bank accounts, and considered them no different from his personal accounts. At trial he testified that in 2012 and 2013 he “didn’t really feel like there was a difference ” between ONY Sales’ bank accounts and his personal bank accounts. When question ed how ONY Sales paid him for his work in 2011, because he received no paycheck, he testified that he “used the money from ONY Sales for personal expenses.” Petitioner’s admission directly contradicts [the] argument that cash withdrawn from ONY Sales accounts should be considered cost of goods sold. It instead supports Examiner’s characterization of Petitioner’s cash withdrawals from ONY Sales accounts as taxable income to the extent not otherwise explained.

The Tax Court upheld over $9 million in taxes on the taxpayer couple, plus millions more in penalties. But at least they got to use some nice cars:

For example, he used funds from ONY Sales to purchase luxury vehicles, such as a Lamborghini, a Ferrari, a Rolls Royce, and a Mercedes-Benz.

The moral? If you don't keep good records, the IRS will keep bad ones for you. And you can't deduct the Ferrari and Rolls as "cost of goods sold."

 

What day is it?

It's National Chocolate Covered Anything Day! It's also Beethoven's Birthday, more or less. Chocolate and Ode to Joy mix well. 

Make a habit of sustained success.

Every organization deserves to realize its full potential. Let us help you find yours.
Learn More

About the Author(s)

Joe Kristan

Joe B. Kristan, CPA

Partner
After 38 years centered on tax consulting for closely held businesses and their owners, Joe is joining Eide Bailly's National Tax Office. Joe's responsibilities include communication, process improvement and training. He is a principal contributor to the Eide Bailly Tax News and Views blog, providing daily updates on tax reform and other tax news. Joe is a Certified Public Accountant and a member of the AICPA Tax Section and Iowa Society of Public Accountants.

Any opinions expressed or implied are those of the author and not necessarily those of Eide Bailly. Opinions found in linked items are those of the authors of the linked item, not of your bloggers or of Eide Bailly. “$” means link may be behind a paywall. Items here do not constitute tax advice.