Key Takeaways
- Colorado's Special Legislative Session yields new tax laws
- Texts are telemarketing in Texas
- The state can use alternative apportionment in Minnesota
- Washington expands taxation of services beginning October 1
- Other developments in California, Hawaii, Indiana and New York
Welcome to this edition of our roundup of state tax developments. The State Tax News and Views is published biweekly. Consider the Eide Bailly State & Local Tax team for your state tax planning, compliance and incentive needs.
Rethinking Rolling Conformity - Tyler P. Johnson, Tax Notes ($):
Rolling conformity is the practice of automatically adopting federal definitions of taxable income into a state’s tax code. It is often viewed as the simplest and most efficient form of state tax policy. Unsurprisingly, it is also the most common method of incorporating federal tax law at the state level. As of 2025, 59 percent of all states that tax corporate income (26 out of 44) use rolling conformity. However, rolling conformity also poses a significant and underappreciated risk to state revenue systems. When federal tax law shifts, states that conform automatically may find themselves adopting provisions that dramatically alter their tax bases, often without legislative action or public debate.
This article argues that rolling conformity is not just a technical choice; it’s a policy lever with real fiscal consequences.
This article argues that rolling conformity is not just a technical choice; it’s a policy lever with real fiscal consequences.
Scoreboard - Q2 2025 - Tax Notes ($):
This is the second edition of the Eversheds Sutherland SALT Scoreboard for 2025. [...] This installment includes developments in investment tax credit limitations, the exhaustion of administrative remedies, and cloud service taxation. We also spotlight a couple of recent decisions from the Empire State.
Experts Urge Caution as State Tax Agencies Deploy Generative AI - Emily Hollingsworth, Tax Notes ($):
Will taxpayers face penalties for relying on bad advice provided by tax departments using generative artificial intelligence?
Experts say it’s an important question for the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) and other state tax departments to consider as they roll out generative AI.
[...]
Academics and attorneys are concerned that customer service agents using generative AI solutions for taxpayer queries might miss errors in its outputs and provide the incorrect information to taxpayers. Responses from the CDTFA suggest that taxpayers can only challenge incorrect information provided by generative AI if the advice was given in writing
Experts say it’s an important question for the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) and other state tax departments to consider as they roll out generative AI.
[...]
Academics and attorneys are concerned that customer service agents using generative AI solutions for taxpayer queries might miss errors in its outputs and provide the incorrect information to taxpayers. Responses from the CDTFA suggest that taxpayers can only challenge incorrect information provided by generative AI if the advice was given in writing
State And Local Tax Takeaways From August - Maria Koklanaris, Law360 ($):
From the Fourth Circuit ruling that a provision in Maryland's digital advertising tax is unconstitutional to new combined reporting rules coming for the District of Columbia, August didn't slow down in the state and local tax arena.
State-By-State Roundup
California
Tax Pros Await Newly Empowered California Tribunal's Next Moves - Casey Murray, Bloomberg Tax ($):
Now that the California Office of Tax Appeals has newly solidified authority to thwart regulations issued by the state’s other tax agencies, taxpayer groups and practitioners are waiting to see what the tribunal does with this power.
The office’s reach could expand under an opinion issued last month by state Attorney General Rob Bonta that affirmed its ability to strike down regulations issued by the state’s two other tax agencies. The decision had been awaited for more than two years after the office, which is scheduled to deliver its monthly batch of opinions on Tuesday, asked the attorney general in a June 2023 letter to weigh in on its authority.
The office’s reach could expand under an opinion issued last month by state Attorney General Rob Bonta that affirmed its ability to strike down regulations issued by the state’s two other tax agencies. The decision had been awaited for more than two years after the office, which is scheduled to deliver its monthly batch of opinions on Tuesday, asked the attorney general in a June 2023 letter to weigh in on its authority.
Colorado
Colorado's Special Legislative Session Yields New Tax Laws - Melissa Menter, Eide Bailly:
Colorado Governor Jared Polis signed several bills in a special session that was needed to balance the budget following passage of H.R.1, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
H.B. 25B-1001 indefinitely extends the state's current addback of the 20% federal qualified business income deduction. The addback was previously scheduled to sunset at the end of 2025.
H.B. 25B-1002 creates an addback for the federal deduction for foreign-derived deduction eligible income (FDDEI), and, as of January 1, 2026, adds Hong Kong, Ireland, Liechtenstein, Netherlands, and Singapore to the list of foreign countries that are considered to be tax havens.
H.B. 25B-1003 eliminates the reduced insurance premium rate charged to insurance companies with a home office or regional home office in Colorado, restoring the regular 2% rate for those companies.
H.B. 25B-1004 authorizes the Department of the Treasury to sell nonrefundable insurance premium tax credits to qualified taxpayers. Such credits will generate revenue in the current fiscal year and be used to offset insurance premium tax liabilities in future years.
H.B. 25B-1005 Eliminates the sales tax vendor fee effective January 1, 2026. Under the sales tax vendor fee, retailers with total taxable sales of $1 million or less in a given filing period could retain a portion of the sales taxes they collected to cover their expenses in collecting and remitting the tax.
H.B. 25B-1001 indefinitely extends the state's current addback of the 20% federal qualified business income deduction. The addback was previously scheduled to sunset at the end of 2025.
H.B. 25B-1002 creates an addback for the federal deduction for foreign-derived deduction eligible income (FDDEI), and, as of January 1, 2026, adds Hong Kong, Ireland, Liechtenstein, Netherlands, and Singapore to the list of foreign countries that are considered to be tax havens.
H.B. 25B-1003 eliminates the reduced insurance premium rate charged to insurance companies with a home office or regional home office in Colorado, restoring the regular 2% rate for those companies.
H.B. 25B-1004 authorizes the Department of the Treasury to sell nonrefundable insurance premium tax credits to qualified taxpayers. Such credits will generate revenue in the current fiscal year and be used to offset insurance premium tax liabilities in future years.
H.B. 25B-1005 Eliminates the sales tax vendor fee effective January 1, 2026. Under the sales tax vendor fee, retailers with total taxable sales of $1 million or less in a given filing period could retain a portion of the sales taxes they collected to cover their expenses in collecting and remitting the tax.
Hawaii
Hawaii Transient Tax Is Unconstitutional, Cruise Cos. Say - Jacqueline McCool, Law360 ($):
The extension of Hawaii's 11% transient accommodation tax to cruise ship passengers under a new law violates the U.S. Constitution, a group of cruise companies told a U.S. district court.
In a complaint filed Wednesday, Cruise Lines International Association Inc., Honolulu Ship Supply Co., Kaua'i Kilohana Partners and Aloha Anuenue Tours LLC allege that Hawaii violated the Constitution when it extended the state's transient accommodation tax to cruise ship passengers. The cruise companies said imposing the tax on cruise customers conflicts with the Constitution's tonnage clause and violates the federal Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1884 and the First Amendment.
In a complaint filed Wednesday, Cruise Lines International Association Inc., Honolulu Ship Supply Co., Kaua'i Kilohana Partners and Aloha Anuenue Tours LLC allege that Hawaii violated the Constitution when it extended the state's transient accommodation tax to cruise ship passengers. The cruise companies said imposing the tax on cruise customers conflicts with the Constitution's tonnage clause and violates the federal Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1884 and the First Amendment.
Indiana
Indiana DOR Rules Generative AI Chatbot Not Subject to Sales Tax - Emily Hollingsworth, Tax Notes ($):
A company’s generative artificial intelligence chatbot constitutes a service and is not subject to Indiana sales tax, according to a state Department of Revenue ruling.
Revenue Ruling No. 2025-02-RST, published in the August 20 Indiana Register, was in reply to an out-of-state company's request for a determination on whether its chatbot service would be subject to the state's 7 percent sales tax.
According to the ruling's statement of facts, the generative AI chatbot “is trained to respond to plain language prompts in a human-like manner” and can assist customers with writing, analysis, coding, and problem solving. Customers can also obtain the chatbot’s application programming interface key “to integrate advanced language understanding and generation capabilities in their own applications,” the ruling said.
Revenue Ruling No. 2025-02-RST, published in the August 20 Indiana Register, was in reply to an out-of-state company's request for a determination on whether its chatbot service would be subject to the state's 7 percent sales tax.
According to the ruling's statement of facts, the generative AI chatbot “is trained to respond to plain language prompts in a human-like manner” and can assist customers with writing, analysis, coding, and problem solving. Customers can also obtain the chatbot’s application programming interface key “to integrate advanced language understanding and generation capabilities in their own applications,” the ruling said.
Minnesota
Minnesota Supreme Court Finds Alternative Apportionment Was Appropriate - Chris Martin, Eide Bailly:
The Minnesota Supreme Court found in favor of the state in E.I. duPont de Nemours and Company & Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Revenue. The Commissioner was successful in applying an alternative apportionment challenge to DuPont’s inclusion of hedging receipts in the sales factor, even though the parties agreed that the forward exchange contracts (FEC) at issue were part of the company’s ordinary course of business and would have been included in the sales factor at gross under the default apportionment statute. The burden for applying alternative apportionment is on the Commissioner in this case.
Taxpayers can also apply for alternative apportionment in Minnesota and should take notice that the Court was open to alternative apportionment arguments when the receipts were qualitatively different from other business receipts and quantitatively distortive to the sales factor. However, taxpayers need to be careful because these are very fact sensitive determinations.
Taxpayers can also apply for alternative apportionment in Minnesota and should take notice that the Court was open to alternative apportionment arguments when the receipts were qualitatively different from other business receipts and quantitatively distortive to the sales factor. However, taxpayers need to be careful because these are very fact sensitive determinations.
New York
New York Bill Would Tax Digital Asset Sales and Transfers - Emily Hollingsworth, Tax Notes ($):
A New York bill would impose an excise tax on the sale and transfer of digital assets like cryptocurrency and non-fungible tokens.
[. . .]
The tax would be levied at a rate of .2 percent on digital asset transactions. The bill defines digital assets as assets that are issued or transferred using blockchain technology, including "digital currencies, digital coins, digital non-fungible tokens or other similar assets."
[. . .]
The tax would be levied at a rate of .2 percent on digital asset transactions. The bill defines digital assets as assets that are issued or transferred using blockchain technology, including "digital currencies, digital coins, digital non-fungible tokens or other similar assets."
Texas
Texts are now Telemarketing in Texas - Melissa Menter, Eide Bailly:
Effective September 1, 2025, under Texas S.B. 140, texts are now considered to be "telephone solicitation" for purposes of Texas' telemarketing regulations. This change may be relevant to many businesses that engage in marketing to Texas consumers via text messages.
Any business soliciting Texas consumers by text must now annually register with the state, pay a $200 fee, follow record-keeping protocols, and post a $10,000 security bond, among other requirements.
Tax Bites: Tips, Tricks and Opportunities in SALT
Washington To Expand Taxation of Services Beginning October 1 - Elizabeth Gray, Eide Bailly:
In a few short weeks Washington State will begin enforcing SB 5814. This will expand the taxation, for sales and use tax, of many previously untaxed services. You may remember the insight we posted a few months ago, alerting you to this broad legislation. If you are doing business in Washington, and previously were subject to the state’s Business & Occupation Tax for services, you will want to verify if your services will be subject to sales tax on October 1st, 2025. Preparing now to appropriately calculate and tax these services will allow the burden to fall where it is supposed to, on your Washington customers, not your bottom line.
Washington is only one in a long line of states to review their tax revenue and find it lacking. If you are adding new revenue lines to your current offerings, considering expanding into new states, or hiring remote workers in states where you have previously not had a presence, it is never too early to begin reviewing the often-conflicting state treatments of ‘nexus’ and ‘taxability’.
Reach out to your Eide Bailly SALT team to help you keep you apprised of these changes, and plan ahead for compliance.
Washington is only one in a long line of states to review their tax revenue and find it lacking. If you are adding new revenue lines to your current offerings, considering expanding into new states, or hiring remote workers in states where you have previously not had a presence, it is never too early to begin reviewing the often-conflicting state treatments of ‘nexus’ and ‘taxability’.
Reach out to your Eide Bailly SALT team to help you keep you apprised of these changes, and plan ahead for compliance.
We're Here to Help
From business growth to compliance and digital optimization, Eide Bailly is here to help you thrive and embrace opportunity.
Speak to our specialists
