Blog

Tax News & Views Cleans The Left Side of the Virtual Desktop Roundup

By Joe Kristan
October 17, 2025
Old computer with 3.5" floppies and modem

Key Takeaways

  • Reported list of targets includes "major Democratic donors."

  • "Pushing the boundary" of Code section banning executive branch audit targeting.

  • ACA credits remain focus of record-setting shutdown.

  • Tax dispute resolution complicated by shutdown.

  • Intimidation strategy for tariffs.

  • Magical math and the national debt.

  • Clean Your Virtual Desktop Day.

Trump Team Plans IRS Overhaul to Enable Pursuit of Left-Leaning Groups - Brian Schwartz, Richard Rubin and Joel Schectman, Wall Street Journal:

The Trump administration is preparing sweeping changes at the Internal Revenue Service that would allow the agency to pursue criminal inquiries of left-leaning groups more easily, according to people familiar with the matter.

A senior IRS official involved in the effort has drawn up a list of potential targets that includes major Democratic donors, some of the people said.

The undertaking aims to install allies of President Trump at the IRS criminal-investigative division, or IRS-CI, to exert firmer control over the unit and weaken the involvement of IRS lawyers in criminal investigations, officials said. The proposed changes could open the door to politically motivated probes and are being driven by Gary Shapley, an adviser to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.

 

Move to Direct IRS CI at Left-Leaning Groups Is Questioned - Benjamin Valdez and Nathan Richman, Tax Notes ($):

The administration’s plan to weaken the role of chief counsel (criminal tax) in CI’s work and remove current CI Chief Guy Ficco is said to be part of an effort to investigate certain left-leaning groups, including groups affiliated with billionaire George Soros.

...

Former IRS Commissioner John Koskinen, who led the agency during the Tea Party targeting scandal, said the move to install loyalists at the top of CI with the goal of targeting certain groups is pushing the boundary of what is legal under section 7217, which prevents the executive branch from launching audits or investigations into specific taxpayers.


“If, once the pieces are in place, the White House or anyone in the White House indicates in any way who should be targeted, a good case could be made that they’ve committed a criminal violation,” Koskinen said in an email.

Koskinen added that the change in policy will likely undermine taxpayer confidence in the IRS.

 

WSJ Article Reporting Possible Political Changes to IRS CI - Jack Townsend, Federal Tax Crimes. "Stepping back from any personal interest I may have, this is really scary if the article is anywhere near accurate. The future credibility and effectiveness of CI to serve its mission of undergirding the tax system will be severely damaged."

 

Hunter Biden’s Lawyer Wins Defamation Case Against IRS Agents - Tristan Navera, Bloomberg ($):

A federal judge threw out a defamation lawsuit filed by two IRS agents against Hunter Biden’s attorney, finding that the lawyer’s statements were constitutionally protected opinions.

Agents Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler, who disclosed Biden’s tax information, claimed attorney Abbe Lowell made defamatory statements in a 2023 letter sent to a congressional committee that accused them of violating grand jury secrecy rules. 

 

Shutdown Setting Records. ACA Credits Remain Central to Stalemate.

Shutdown’s 17th Day Marks Longest Government-Wide Funding Lapse - Maeve Sheehey, Bloomberg ($):

Funding for every government agency has lapsed for 17 days and counting, marking the longest full government-wide shutdown in US history.

Hundreds of thousands of federal workers — including congressional staffers — have been furloughed (or are working without pay) for more than two weeks. The longest previous government-wide funding lapse, meaning no spending bills were signed into law before a deadline, lasted 16 days in fiscal 2014.

 

ACA Tax Credit Remains at Center of Shutdown Fight - Katie Lobosco, Tax Notes ($):

The expiring healthcare tax credit continues to be a sticking point as both parties dig in, bracing for one of the longest government shutdowns in history.

...

Party leaders on both sides haven’t budged from their positions. Democrats demand some kind of assurance to address the expiration of the enhanced premium tax credit. Republicans refuse to negotiate the issue until the government reopens and say the program must be reformed if it is extended.

 

Scalise on FOD: Republicans won’t extend Obamacare credits - Jake Sherman and Andrew Desiderio, Punchbowl News:

Inside the House Republican leadership, the belief is that somewhere between 20% and 30% of GOP lawmakers would be open to extending the tax credits at the heart of the government shutdown. The House has been out of session for the last 28 days, so it’s impossible to make an independent judgement about whether that estimate is correct.

But what’s clear is that it’s wildly wrong to believe that House Republicans would simply return to Capitol Hill and pass an extension of the subsidies without vigorous debate and a drastic overhaul of the program.

“And Democrats know that,” Scalise said. “They know that the mess they created — and I know they’re trying to dump the problems of Obamacare off on everybody, other than the people that actually passed and voted for Obamacare. Those high premiums are a result of Democrat policies. If they really wanted to work with us on lower premiums, there are a lot of bipartisan ideas that you could come to the table and bring and do, and they’ve got to stop fighting the things that have been proven to work, as well.”

 

It’s ‘too late’ to extend ACA subsidies without major disruptions, some states and lawmakers say - Robert King and Kelly Hooper, Politico:

Time is quickly running out to shield Obamacare customers from explosive sticker shock.

State insurance officials are warning that the longer Congress waits to extend enhanced Affordable Care Act subsidies, which help low- and middle-income people afford premiums, the more difficult it will be to update rates before consumers start shopping for 2026 coverage on Nov. 1.

As a result, they said, some enrollees — particularly young and healthy people — could be frightened off by the higher rates and drop coverage, even if the rates can be adjusted later. This would further undermine Obamacare by worsening the risk pool, driving up ACA costs even more.

Tax Court’s Shutdown-Related Trial Cancellations Add to Backlog - Chris Cioffi, Bloomberg ($):

The US Tax Court’s move to cancel two weeks of trials due to the government shutdown is threatening to jam up the already busy system.

The canceled trial sessions will likely spur further delays in litigation as a skeleton crew of IRS attorneys—still on the job amid shutdown-related furloughs and several rounds of Trump administration downsizing efforts earlier this year—tries to triage cases.

“This is bad news for law-abiding citizens,” Rod Rosenstein, deputy attorney general in President Donald Trump’s first administration who’s now partner at Baker McKenzie, said in an email. “The Tax Court already has a huge case backlog that will get worse, adding to the problems created by furloughs of IRS employees.”

 

Taking the Taxman to Court Is Complicated by Government Shutdown - Guinevere Moore, Bloomberg ($):

The IRS has suspended most non-essential services, including live taxpayer assistance, processing of paper returns, and many examinations. However, so-called critical enforcement functions, such as automated collection notices and certain levy actions, may still proceed.

This creates a unique challenge: Taxpayers may continue to receive collection letters or automated notices, but their ability to reach an IRS representative to resolve the issue may be limited. In other words, the system keeps moving, but the people behind the notices are no more accessible (or helpful) than the Wizard of Oz.

Related: Eide Bailly IRS Dispute Resolution and Collections Services

 

Government Shuts Down, Life Doesn't

Employers Need to Prepare Now for ‘No Tax on Tips’ Compliance - Jason Feingertz, Ryan Glasgow, and Elizabeth King, Bloomberg ($):

The administration’s tax-and-spending package enacts the widely publicized “no tax on tips” and “no tax on overtime” changes to the tax code. These provisions will decrease tax burdens for many employees while presenting new compliance obligations for employers.

These changes are retroactive to Jan. 1, 2025, so employers should be focused on these issues now. 

 

Tax News & Views International Weekly: The Global Tax Shutdown Dilemma - Alex Parker, Eide Bailly:

As the government shutdown stretches into its third week—with little reason to hope it will be resolved soon—the tax world is scrambling to understand the implications. Taxpayer services have been reduced or suspended, guidance from the U.S. Treasury Department may be delayed, and audits are expected to slow down.

One matter has gotten less attention, but could still be crucial for many taxpayers—will Treasury and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development be able to hash out details for the 15% global minimum tax agreement in time, as the U.S. officials remaining at work struggle to keep everything running?

 

Tariffs - The Intimidation Strategy

Trump’s first Supreme Court argument - Washington Post Editorial Board:

President Donald Trump’s strategy for defending his tariffs in court is to make the case about himself as much as possible — and dare the justices to defy him.
The latest indication of that came Wednesday, when he revealed that he hopes to attend oral arguments before the Supreme Court on the legality of the worldwide tariffs he imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The hearing is set for Nov. 5, the morning after the off-year elections. “I think I’m gonna go to the Supreme Court to watch it,” he said at the White House. “I’ve not done that, and ... I had some pretty big cases. I think it’s one of the most important cases ever brought."

...
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled against Trump in August, but its order is on hold until the justices decide. Trump has already signaled to the justices that the case is of huge importance to him. The government’s brief submitted last month contains colorful language that is highly unusual in Supreme Court litigation. “With tariffs, we are a rich nation; without tariffs, we are a poor nation,” it says.

 

Truckers Are Struggling. Trump’s New Tariff Could Make Things Worse. - Peter Eavis, New York Times:

President Trump is planning to impose a 25 percent tariff on medium- and heavy-duty trucks and truck parts on Nov. 1. The Trump administration has released almost no details, creating confusion among truck makers and truckers and prompting much lobbying to try to shape the final policy.

If few exemptions are granted, industry analysts say, the tariff could raise the cost of manufacturing trucks and repairing old ones.

Mr. Trump is imposing the tariff under a national security provision, known as Section 232, that he has also used to tax imports of steel, aluminum, cars, medical devices and lumber.

 

College Athletes and State Taxes

High Earning, Higher Stakes: Tax Challenges for Athletes - Melissa Menter and Colette Sutton, Eide Bailly, quoting Amy Hodges of Tax Notes: "Now that student-athletes can be paid, states can tax that compensation. But if states like Florida or Texas don’t tax income at all, why should a sports wunderkind choose to attend university — and play and earn — in a state with an income tax? Legislators are taking notice."

 

Blogs and Bits

Medical tax break inflation adjustments in 2026 could be a great Rx - Kay Bell on Substack. "For the 2026 tax year, you can put up to $3,400 in your FSA. That’s a $100 increase from this year’s $3,300 FSA contribution limit."

IRS Issues Applicable Federal Rates (AFR) for November 2025 - Bailey Finney, Eide Bailly. "The Section 382 long-term tax-exempt rate used to compute the loss carryforward limits for corporation ownership changes during November 2025 is 3.65%."

Trump's New Tariffs on Furniture Will Be Costly, and Americans Will Pay - Veronique De Rugy, Reason. "U.S. tariffs are taxes on Americans, and stealthy ones."

U.S. Partnership Tax Planning for Nonresident Aliens: A Complete Guide - Manasa Nadig, The Buzz About Taxes. "Picture this: You're a successful entrepreneur living abroad, and you've just made what seems like a straightforward investment in a U.S. real estate partnership. Fast forward twelve months, and you're staring at yet another IRS notice in your mailbox—the third one in as many years. Sound familiar?"

Related: Eide Bailly Global Mobility Services.

 

Fiscal Follies Friday

Most Americans say taxing the rich is best way to reduce federal debt: Gallup - Sara Fortinsky, The Hill:

Raising income taxes for wealthy Americans is the most popular way of reducing the federal debt, according to the latest Gallup poll.

...

Raising income taxes for wealthy Americans is the most popular way of reducing the federal debt, according to the latest Gallup poll. The survey, conducted in September, asks Americans whether they support a range of methods aimed at reducing the federal debt, which has ballooned in recent years to more than $37 trillion. Only two proposals receive a majority support of U.S. adults: 63 percent back “increasing income tax rates for upper-income Americans,” and 54 percent support “increasing tax revenues by making major changes to the current federal tax code.”

Only two proposals receive a majority support of U.S. adults: 63 percent back “increasing income tax rates for upper-income Americans,” and 54 percent support “increasing tax revenues by making major changes to the current federal tax code.”

The survey also shows that only 39% of respondents favor changing Social Security and Medicare to reduce their cost. 

The poll is a neat summary of the flawed thinking behind the current federal fiscal mess. 

The biggest driver of federal spending now is Social Security and Medicare:

Can we tax the rich enough to solve our problems? The budget deficit for fiscal year 2024 was $1.83 trillion, out of $6.8 billion in spending. The net worth of all billionaires put together comes to about $5.5 trillion, which is less than what the government spends in a year, let alone the  $38 trillion national debt. A comprehensive study of revenue maximizing taxes on the rich estimates that these would max out at about $560 billion annually, well under 1/3 of the annual deficit. So, short answer: no.

Addressing the fiscal imbalance would mean some combination of reducing Social Security and Medicare spending and increasing taxes in a broad way. But if the poll is accurate, the voters insist on arithmetic-defying solutions.

 

What day is it?

It's National Clean Your Virtual Desktop Day! I hope that doesn't mean I have to close my 27 open browser tabs.

Make a habit of sustained success.

Every organization deserves to realize its full potential. Let us help you find yours.
Learn More

About the Author(s)

Joe Kristan

Joe B. Kristan, CPA

Partner
After 38 years centered on tax consulting for closely held businesses and their owners, Joe is joining Eide Bailly's National Tax Office. Joe's responsibilities include communication, process improvement and training. He is a principal contributor to the Eide Bailly Tax News and Views blog, providing daily updates on tax reform and other tax news. Joe is a Certified Public Accountant and a member of the AICPA Tax Section and Iowa Society of Public Accountants.

Any opinions expressed or implied are those of the author and not necessarily those of Eide Bailly. Opinions found in linked items are those of the authors of the linked item, not of your bloggers or of Eide Bailly. “$” means link may be behind a paywall. Items here do not constitute tax advice.