Blog

Tax News & Views IRS Commissioner Napping Roundup

By Trina Pinneau
Updated on March 10, 2026
Napping

Key Takeaways

  • IRS Commissioner Future
  • Trump Accounts
  • Proposed Legislation
  • Tariffs
  • No Tax on Tips Difficulties
  • In the Courts
  • Napping

IRS Commissioner Future

Trump Is Skirting Rules on IRS Commissioner Nomination, Dems Say – Cady Stanton, Tax Notes ($):

A group of Senate Democrats told the Trump administration that the appointment of an IRS CEO was meant to circumvent the vetting and confirmation process for a new commissioner, as the acting leader in that role recently passed the deadline on his temporary authority.

The administration is ignoring or avoiding requirements for IRS leadership by keeping Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in the role of acting IRS commissioner and failing to nominate a replacement, a trio of Senate Democrats wrote in a March 9 letter to Bessent and to Dan Scavino, White House deputy chief of staff and director of the Office of Presidential Personnel.

What’s Next as Bessent Hits Acting IRS Chief Limit: Explained – Erin Slowey, Bloomberg ($):

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who has been acting IRS commissioner since August, is setting up the IRS for potential legal risks the longer he stays in the spot temporarily.

Commissioner is one of two IRS positions requiring Senate confirmation, and both roles are being held by acting officials. Treasury Assistant Secretary for Tax Policy Ken Kies has been filling the vacant IRS chief counsel job. No one is nominated for either IRS role.



That raises the question of what happens at that limit. Bessent became acting commissioner Aug. 9, according to the IRS website, meaning he hit 210 days in the position on March 7. Treasury and the White House didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.

 

Trump Accounts

Nondeductible Trump Account Donations Still Deemed Appealing – Trevor Sikes & Kelsey Brooks, Tax Notes ($):

Incentives to participate in the tax-deferred Trump account program for children could still attract wealthy donors and kids’ family members even as questions linger over the tax treatment of those contributions and eligibility requirements.

Observers highlighted several benefits offered by the Trump accounts program that can motivate individual donors to contribute despite the lack of a charitable deduction, as well as create valuable opportunities for families looking to participate.

 

Proposed Legislation

No Tax on $75,000 of Income? Dem Proposes Big Standard Deduction – Katie Lobosco, Tax Notes ($):

Sen. Cory A. Booker, D-N.J., is unveiling a new tax plan that would more than double the standard deduction, increase the child tax credit and earned income tax credit, and raise the corporate tax rate.

The legislative proposal, and others recently unveiled by Democratic lawmakers, may signal where the Democratic party is focusing ahead of the 2026 midterm and 2028 presidential elections, but they have little chance of becoming law while Republicans control Congress and the White House.

Booker’s proposal would increase the standard deduction to $75,000 for married couples filing jointly, up from $32,200 in tax year 2026, and proportionally for single filers and heads of households, according to a March 9 release from his office.

Booker’s Standard Deduction Proposal Sparks Pushback – Kay Steiger, Bloomberg ($):

Sen. Cory Booker ignited controversy by announcing a new tax proposal that promises to expand the standard deduction to the first $75,000 of household income for married couples — and paying for it with a range of corporate tax rate hikes.

The planned legislation, dubbed the Keep Your Paycheck Act, also would expand the Earned Income Tax Credit eligibility to younger and older workers as well as boost the child tax credit to $4,320 for children under 6 and to $3,600 for those from 6 to 17 from the current $2,200 credit for children under 17.

 

Tariffs

Legal Fight Reopens Over Trump’s Push to Tax Low-Value Imports – Erik Larson & Zoe Tillman, Bloomberg ($):

A US trade court has revived a challenge to President Donald Trump’s move to end a tariff exemption for low-dollar imports, resuming a legal fight with financial stakes for online retailers and small businesses as well as Americans who directly buy goods overseas.

Litigation over what’s known as the de minimis exemption was on hold while the US Supreme Court considered a broader dispute over Trump’s global tariffs. The justices in February struck down his use of an emergency powers law to impose duties, but didn’t address his authority to halt the exemption for low-value packages — a related but separate question.

Kate Hudson's Activewear Co. Sued For Tariff Refunds – Lauren Berg, Law 360 ($). “Fabletics LLC, the activewear company cofounded by actress Kate Hudson, faces a proposed class action in Illinois state court from customers who say the company passed the cost of President Donald Trump's 'illegal' 2025 tariffs onto customers and should be forced to refund those overages.”

 

No Tax on Tips Difficulties

‘No Tax on Overtime’ Isn’t All It Seems for Some Workers – Andrew Duehren, New York Times:

Despite Mr. Trump’s “no tax” branding, overtime pay is still subject to taxes, including payroll taxes and, potentially, state taxes. Some people who work overtime won’t be able to claim the tax break at all. Only Americans who, according to the Fair Labor Standards Act, must be paid time and a half for working more than 40 hours in a week can claim it. And even then, only a portion of the overtime pay — the additional “half” in time and a half — is exempt from the federal income tax.

Even with those and other restrictions, the overtime deduction is among the biggest new tax cuts that the law is offering this year. Mr. Trump and Republicans are betting that changes like the overtime deduction, once they translate into larger-than-usual refunds in Americans’ bank accounts this spring, will stimulate the economy and help the party in the midterm elections.

 

In the Courts

Partnership Notice Valid Despite Flaws, Tax Court Says – Kristen A. Parillo, Tax Notes ($). “An IRS notice of final partnership adjustment (FPA) to a conservation easement partnership was still valid even though the proposed notice had been addressed to the wrong partnership representative, the Tax Court held in a precedential opinion.”

Tax Court OKs IRS Partnership Procedures In Easement Fight – Kat Lucero, Law 360 ($). “The IRS properly notified a partnership of tax deficiencies tied to a 2018 conservation easement deduction under the 2015 centralized partnership audit regime, the U.S. Tax Court unanimously ruled Monday, saying the entity failed to prove that agency mistakes had hindered its audit response.”

 

DC Circuit Questions If Trump’s $100,000 H-1B Fee Is a Tax – Andrew Kreighbaum, Bloomberg ($). “A federal appellate panel focused Monday on whether a $100,000 Trump fee on H-1B worker petitions should be considered a tax, or a use of presidential authority to restrict entry to the US.”

 

SCOTUSblog Founder Goldstein To Be Sentenced In June – Emily Sawicki, Law 360 ($). “SCOTUSblog founder Thomas Goldstein, currently under home confinement in Washington, D.C., after a Maryland jury convicted him on tax evasion and mortgage fraud charges, will face sentencing in June.”

 

What Day is it?

Finally. The most wonderful day of the year. It’s National Napping Day! Celebrate early and often!

 

 

Make a habit of sustained success.

Every organization deserves to realize its full potential. Let us help you find yours.
Learn More

About the Author(s)

Trina Pinneau photo

Trina Pinneau

Senior Manager
Trina has more than 10 years of public accounting experience providing tax consulting services and analyzing complex tax situations. She has spent the majority of her time in the credits and incentives space with a focus on energy credits and excise taxes. Trina also has experience in tax controversy and accounting methods. In joining Eide Bailly's National Tax Office Trina is focusing her efforts on energy efficiency incentives while being a resource for the excise and tax controversy team.

Any opinions expressed or implied are those of the author and not necessarily those of Eide Bailly. Opinions found in linked items are those of the authors of the linked item, not of your bloggers or of Eide Bailly. “$” means link may be behind a paywall. Items here do not constitute tax advice.