Blog

Tax News & Views Retirement Accounts and a Daiquiri

Trina Pinneau
July 19, 2024

Key Takeaways

  • Retirement Accounts

  • Hunter Biden

  • Taxes on Tips?

  • Research Credit

  • Conservation Easements

  • Chevron

  • Daiquiris

Retirement Accounts

Final IRS Rules Will Let Workers Keep Cash in 401(k)s Longer – Ben Miller, Bloomberg ($):

The IRS has issued final regulations raising the age at which workers must start taking funds out of their qualified retirement accounts.

The final rules (TD 10001; RIN:1545-BP82) released Thursday reflect changes from the SECURE Act 2.0 that allow account holders to leave 401(k), 403(b), and individual retirement account savings in place past the previously prescribed age of 70½ while still avoiding heavy excise taxes typically associated with late withdrawal of those assets.

IRS Keeps Contentious Required Minimum Distribution 10-Year Rule – Caitlin Mullaney, Tax Notes ($):

The IRS has issued final regulations implementing legislative changes for required minimum distributions (RMDs), including a highly contested interpretation of the new 10-year rule.

“While certain changes were made in response to comments received on the proposed regulations issued in 2022, the final regulations generally follow those proposed regulations,” the IRS said in a July 18 release announcing the final rules (T.D. 10001).

Final IRS Rules Require Beneficiaries to Take Distributions – Anna Scott Farrell, Law360 ($):

Beneficiaries of retirement account owners who died after starting to take distributions must continue taking the distributions annually, the Internal Revenue Service said Thursday in final regulations on required minimum distributions that rejected feedback saying the requirement was overly complex.

The IRS said the suggestion from commenters that beneficiaries should not have to continue the distributions — specifically, if the remaining account balance is required to be fully distributed within 10 years of the individual's death — conflicted with a plain reading of the applicable laws.

Hunter Biden

Hunter Biden seeks dismissal of tax, gun cases, citing decision to toss Trump's classified docs case – Eric Tucker and Alanna Durkin Richer, Washington Post:

President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter, asked federal judges on Thursday to dismiss tax and gun cases against him, citing a ruling in Florida this week that threw out a separate prosecution of former President Donald Trump.

The requests in federal court in Delaware and California underscore the potential ramifications of U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon’s dismissal Monday of the classified documents case against Trump and the possibility that it could unsettle the legal landscape surrounding Justice Department special counsels.

Taxes on Tips?

No Taxes on Tips? A Trump Idea Gains Ground. – Andrew Duehren, New York Times:

In Donald J. Trump’s telling, the idea was born over dinner at his Las Vegas hotel, where the waitress serving his table complained about the burden of paying taxes on her tips.



The proposal has rapidly become more than just a rally talking point. The Republican Party has officially embraced it in its platform, and House Speaker Mike Johnson, Republican of Louisiana, has said he would “pass it as soon as we can.” Some Democrats are also warming to making tipped income tax-free, with the two senators representing Nevada, a swing state with large restaurant and casino industries, endorsing it.

Research Credit

IRS Research Credit Proposal Roils Taxpayers Even After Tweaks – Caleb Harshberger, Bloomberg ($):

New reporting requirements for research and development tax credits proposed through an IRS form change still threaten to squeeze mid- to large-sized businesses, even after the agency tried to ease off in response to taxpayer feedback.

The IRS issued the revised draft form in June, exempting smaller businesses from proposed reporting requirements. In a change from revisions proposed last fall, it also cut the amount of information taxpayers would have to report when claiming the credit to no more than 80% of research credit claims or no more than 50 business units.

Conservation Easements

New IRS Easement Settlements Put Tax Pros in A Pickle – Kat Lucero, Law360 ($):

The IRS' new settlement program for partnerships that participated in conservation easements that haven't yet ended up in court comes with terms far sweeter than past offers, making it difficult for practitioners to advise clients to take the deal or wait for a better one.

In settlement letters this month, the Internal Revenue Service offered much lower tax and penalty rates to several partnership entities whose tax deduction claims for their conservation easement donations are under examination. The offer stands in glaring contrast to what the agency had proclaimed four years ago in its first public settlement program for litigated easement cases, when it said there would be no better settlement offer.

Anti-Injunction Act Thwarts Easement Appraiser’s Penalty Suit – Kristen A. Parillo, Tax Notes ($):

A conservation easement appraiser’s lawsuit for relief from the IRS’s allegedly unlawful assessment of $187,500 in appraiser penalties is barred by the Anti-Injunction Act, according to a district court.

William Summerour’s suit must be dismissed because he is effectively trying to stop the IRS from collecting a penalty treated as a tax, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia held in a July 16 opinion in Summerour v. IRS.

Ohio Developer’s Conservation Easement Try Rebuffed by Tax Court – Tristan Navera, Bloomberg ($).

“A developer was “negligent” in trying to claim a conservation easement for the redevelopment of Cleveland’s oldest skyscraper by claiming it was giving up on a far larger project, the US Tax Court said Tuesday.”

Tax Court Says It Erred by Not Evaluating Penalty on Partnership – Mike Vilensky, Bloomberg ($).

“The US Tax Court Wednesday said it made a “substantial error” by failing to evaluate if a negligence penalty applied to a Georgia partnership when it disallowed the partnership’s $20.67 million charitable contribution deduction on a conservation easement.”

Chevron

YA Global Pushes Tax Court to Revisit Withholding Decision – Kristen A. Parillo, Tax Notes ($):

A foreign hedge fund is contending that Loper Bright requires the Tax Court to rethink its 2023 ruling that partner-level expenses couldn’t reduce the fund’s U.S. withholding liability.

In a July 11 pleading to the Tax Court in YA Global Investments LP v. Commissioner, the fund sought permission to move for reconsideration of the court’s November 2023 precedential opinion (161 T.C. No. 11).

Big Companies Get Boost in Tax Disputes – Richard Rubin, Wall Street Journal:

The Supreme Court’s new limits on federal agencies’ regulatory powers are rippling through the tax system, and they are poised to tilt some disputes against the government and toward large companies.

Judges or lawyers in at least five pending tax lawsuits—including cases involving FedEx and 3M—have already raised the June ruling in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, which overturned a 40-year-old framework known as the Chevron precedent for how courts evaluate regulations.

What Day is it?

Its National Daiquiri Day. Finally.

For those of you looking to celebrate this weekend, Saturday is Moon Day. Not *that* kind of moon, keep your pants on. And Sunday is National Ice Cream Day, a day definitely worth celebrating!

 


We're Here to Help

We are here to help
From business growth to compliance and digital optimization, Eide Bailly is here to help you thrive and embrace opportunity.
Speak to our specialists

About the Author(s)

Trina Pinneau photo

Trina Pinneau

Senior Manager
Trina has more than 10 years of public accounting experience providing tax consulting services and analyzing complex tax situations. She has spent the majority of her time in the credits and incentives space with a focus on energy credits and excise taxes. Trina also has experience in tax controversy and accounting methods. In joining Eide Bailly's National Tax Office Trina is focusing her efforts on energy efficiency incentives while being a resource for the excise and tax controversy team.

Any opinions expressed or implied are those of the author and not necessarily those of Eide Bailly. Opinions found in linked items are those of the authors of the linked item, not of your bloggers or of Eide Bailly. “$” means link may be behind a paywall. Items here do not constitute tax advice.