Insights: Article

Puerto Rico Tax Law Update - September 2016

January 13, 2017

Puerto Rico originally enacted an Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) regime to prevent multistate corporations doing business in Puerto Rico from shifting profits out of Puerto Rico via the purchase of goods and services from related US mainland affiliates at artificially inflated prices. As part of the AMT, a 2 percent flat tax was imposed on interstate transfers of tangible property between related companies or different offices of the same company. The AMT also included a 20 percent flat tax on expenses for interstate services between those entities.

In May 2015, in response to its fiscal crisis, Puerto Rico enacted a new tax law (Act 72-2015) which introduced modifications to the AMT regime, including an increase of the corporate AMT rate on intercompany purchases. The amended AMT increased AMT's tangible-property tax rate from 2 percent to 6.5 percent. The amendments also eliminated a provision that had exempted a tangible-property transfer from the tax if the transfer price was proved to be an arm's length price.

The US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico declared these AMT changes unconstitutional and issued an injunction immediately prohibiting Puerto Rico from levying, collecting or enforcing this portion of the AMT regime. Puerto Rico’s Treasury Department promptly appealed the decision. In a recent ruling, the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit has affirmed the District Court opinion invalidating Puerto Rico's corporate alternative minimum tax (AMT).

Basis for US Appeals Court Ruling
The US Court of Appeals concluded that the Court had jurisdiction for the present pre-payment proceeding because Puerto Rico's tax-refund process could not be counted on to provide the taxpayer with speedy and efficient remedy for the payment of an invalidated tax, given Puerto Rico's insolvency and legislative and regulatory changes.

The US Court of Appeals also concluded that the AMT violated the dormant Commerce Clause of the US Constitution, which precludes US states from discriminating between transactions on the basis of some interstate element, i.e. a US state may not tax a transaction or incident more heavily when it crosses a US state line than when it occurs entirely within the US state. The US Court of Appeals noted that the dormant Commerce Clause applies to Puerto Rico in the same way that it applies to the US states. The Circuit Court stated that the AMT was facially discriminatory because it taxed only cross-border transactions between a Puerto Rico corporate taxpayer and a home office or related entity outside of Puerto Rico.

Finally, the US Court of Appeals concluded that the AMT did not meet the heightened level of scrutiny required to survive under the dormant Commerce Clause because Puerto Rico's Treasury Department failed to show that there was no other means to advance the legitimate local purpose of targeting profit-shifting. The US Court of Appeals identified narrower alternatives, such as a unitary tax system that uses a formula to distribute multistate corporations' income to different jurisdictions and a traditional transfer-pricing audit of interstate transactions between related parties under the existing regulations.

The US Court of Appeals accordingly affirmed the decision of the US District Court and continued the injunction against enforcement of the Puerto Rico AMT against the taxpayer. 

Recommendation
Taxpayers subject to the AMT on intercompany/branch charges and intercompany purchases related to operations in Puerto Rico should determine if they need to account for the invalidated AMT provisions in determining their taxable income. A similar determination should be made with respect to the calculation of estimated tax payments for the taxable year 2016. 

Latest Insights

September 21, 2018
Article
In the wake of hurricanes, devastating results have been experienced by communities and businesses throughout the Texas Gulf Coast, Caribbean, Florida and southeastern United States. As a result of these catastrophes, businesses will turn to…
September 20, 2018
Firm News
Eide Bailly LLP announced the winners of its 2018 Nonprofit Resourcefullness Awards, recognizing creative and sustainable revenue ideas from nonprofits in Arizona, Colorado, Minnesota, North Dakota and Utah.
September 19, 2018
Article
The IRS has started sending out Letter 5699 asking businesses to verify if they should have filed Forms 1094/1095-C. These forms are required for all ALEs.
September 19, 2018
Recorded Webinar
Are you considering doing business or having employees in Pennsylvania? Have you had issues with your state tax filing? Join our state and local tax team for some helpful insights into Pennsylvania tax filings.
September 19, 2018
Recorded Webinar
Are you considering doing business or having employees in Nevada? Have you had issues with your state tax filing? Join our state and local tax team for some helpful insights into North Dakota tax filings. This webinar will cover registration,…
September 19, 2018
Recorded Webinar
Are you considering doing business or having employees in North Dakota? Have you had issues with your state tax filing? Join our state and local tax team for some helpful insights into North Dakota tax filings. This webinar will cover registration,…
September 18, 2018
Article
As the largest tax reform legislation in the past 30 years becomes reality, it is important to stay up-to-date on planning opportunities and how reform may impact you and your business. Our Tax Reform: Practical Insights examples aim to break down…
September 18, 2018
Tool
Get ahead of tax season with the Eide Bailly Tax Planning Guide. A supplemental strategy guide to help guide year-end and make the tax laws work for you.
September 18, 2018
Article
The SCOTUS Wayfair decision has prompted a new focus on state and local tax compliance. The decision to register, report, and comply is important.