Insights: Article

Changing Goodwill Impairment Rules

By Paul Sirek

June 30, 2016

As many of you complete your year-end financial statements, if you have goodwill carried on your balance sheet it is, again, time to perform the annual impairment test for this asset. You may be surprised to find out the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has changed the rules for all fiscal years beginning after Dec. 15, 2011, for this test. While no requirement to change is necessary for fiscal years ending Dec. 31, 2011, early adoption is permitted and encouraged by the FASB.

In April 2011, the FASB issued an exposure draft intended to simplify how businesses are required to test goodwill for impairment. The FASB gathered comments and issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-08 in September 2011 titled “Testing Goodwill for Impairment.”

ASC 350–Formerly a Two-Step Process
Goodwill impairment testing rules, formerly known as Statements on Financial Accounting Positions (SFAS) 142, are now found under Accounting Codification Standards (ASC) Topic 350–Intangibles–Goodwill and Other. The standard has been in place since 2001 and was essentially a two-step process.

The first step is to determine the fair value of the bank (or the reporting unit). If the fair value of the bank is greater than the equity book value (including goodwill) as of the measurement date, no further testing is necessary as no impairment exists. If the fair value of the bank is not greater than the book value, the second step must be completed.

The second step is to allocate the fair value of the bank to all of the assets (excluding goodwill) and liabilities of the bank as if it were acquired by a market participant on the measurement date. The excess fair value is then allocated to goodwill and compared to the book value of goodwill. The amount of write-off (or impairment) is equal to the book value of goodwill over the fair value of goodwill. The loss recognized cannot exceed the book value of goodwill on the measurement date.

Amendments to ASC 350
Topic 350 has been amended to allow businesses the option to first perform a qualitative assessment. Based on the results of the qualitative assessment, an entity would not be required to perform the traditional two-step process unless it determines it is more likely than not (or greater than 50% probability) that the fair value is less than its carrying value.

Factors that should be considered in this qualitative assessment include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Economic conditions (macro and micro);
  • Industry and market conditions (i.e., competitive environment, market multiples, regulatory changes);
  • Negative changes in costs or financial performance indicators (i.e. negative cash flows or significant declines in revenues); and
  • Entity specific events significantly affecting the management or financial condition of the reporting unit.

A more detailed listing of the qualitative factors can be found at www.fasb.org or by following this link: Topic 350. This qualitative assessment should be documented in a memo and approved by the board of directors for the auditors and regulators. It is also important to understand that if the qualitative assessment is used, an entity is no longer able to carry forward its estimate of fair value from a prior period as previously permitted.

Despite this change, the amendment also allows an entity to opt out of the qualitative assessment in any period and perform the more traditional two-step test. An entity may also elect to perform the qualitative assessment in any future period.

Whichever route one chooses to use in performing its annual impairment testing for goodwill, it remains important to support the assessments or calculations performed with proper documentation. This documentation will allow an entity to efficiently and effectively answer any questions examiners and auditors ask about your goodwill.

Latest Insights

September 21, 2018
Article
In the wake of hurricanes, devastating results have been experienced by communities and businesses throughout the Texas Gulf Coast, Caribbean, Florida and southeastern United States. As a result of these catastrophes, businesses will turn to…
September 20, 2018
Firm News
Eide Bailly LLP announced the winners of its 2018 Nonprofit Resourcefullness Awards, recognizing creative and sustainable revenue ideas from nonprofits in Arizona, Colorado, Minnesota, North Dakota and Utah.
September 19, 2018
Article
The IRS has started sending out Letter 5699 asking businesses to verify if they should have filed Forms 1094/1095-C. These forms are required for all ALEs.
September 19, 2018
Recorded Webinar
Are you considering doing business or having employees in Pennsylvania? Have you had issues with your state tax filing? Join our state and local tax team for some helpful insights into Pennsylvania tax filings.
September 19, 2018
Recorded Webinar
Are you considering doing business or having employees in Nevada? Have you had issues with your state tax filing? Join our state and local tax team for some helpful insights into North Dakota tax filings. This webinar will cover registration,…
September 19, 2018
Recorded Webinar
Are you considering doing business or having employees in North Dakota? Have you had issues with your state tax filing? Join our state and local tax team for some helpful insights into North Dakota tax filings. This webinar will cover registration,…
September 18, 2018
Article
As the largest tax reform legislation in the past 30 years becomes reality, it is important to stay up-to-date on planning opportunities and how reform may impact you and your business. Our Tax Reform: Practical Insights examples aim to break down…
September 18, 2018
Tool
Get ahead of tax season with the Eide Bailly Tax Planning Guide. A supplemental strategy guide to help guide year-end and make the tax laws work for you.
September 18, 2018
Article
The SCOTUS Wayfair decision has prompted a new focus on state and local tax compliance. The decision to register, report, and comply is important.