Insights: Article

Get Ready for Two New Revenue Recognition Standards

By Tim McCutcheon

June 01, 2018

There has been a lot of discussion over the past few years about revenue recognition, and by now, everyone has heard about FASB Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and its effect on revenue recognition of exchange transactions. But did you know that nonprofits must prepare to adopt and implement two new revenue recognition standards, not just the one that has been receiving most of the attention? FASB issued the ASU 2018-08, Clarifying the Scope and the Accounting Guidance for Contributions Received and Contributions Made (Topic 958-605) on June 21,2018. Because most nonprofits engage in both contribution and exchange transactions, both new standards will affect how nonprofits record and report revenue.

The chart below shows the final implementation dates for ASU 2014-09 (Topic 606) and the proposed implementation dates for ASU 2018-08 (Topic 958-605). The implementation dates are similar between the two standards but are not identical in all cases.

Implementation Dates

After implementation of these two new standards, nonprofits will apply Topic 958-605 to all contribution transactions, and Topic 606 to all exchange transactions. Transactions that have elements of both contribution and exchange will be bifurcated, with each element being recorded in accordance with the applicable Topic.

ASU 2018 – 208 (Topic 605)
ASU 2018-08 seeks to address longstanding difficulty and diversity in practice among nonprofits in two key areas:

  1. Characterizing grants and similar contracts with government agencies and others, as (i) reciprocal transactions (exchanges) or (ii) nonreciprocal transactions (contributions).
  2. Distinguishing between conditional and unconditional contributions.

ASU 2018-08 clarifies that, in the case of grants and similar contracts with government agencies and others, unless the resource provider receives commensurate value from the resource recipient, the transaction is most likely a contribution, not an exchange transaction.

ASU 2018-08 provides examples of indirect benefits that do not constitute commensurate value, but that have caused confusion in the past:

 Commensurate Value

ASU 2018-08 goes on to clarify and simplify the determination of when a contribution is conditional, establishing that, for a donor-imposed condition to exist, it must have both:

  1. A right of return of the gift to the donor (if assets already have been received) or a release from the donor’s promise to give (if assets have not yet been received)
  2. A measurable performance barrier or other barrier that must be overcome (the proposed ASU includes a variety of indicators and example to assist in determining what constitutes a barrier)

Many federal awards currently are treated as exchange transactions. Under the new guidance, many, if not most federal awards, will be treated as conditional contributions. The end result generally will be the same, with expenditures of federal awards recognized in accordance with grant provisions and applicable cost principles constituting satisfaction of the conditions.

The new guidance eliminates the need to consider whether the likelihood of not satisfying a donor-imposed condition is remote. Trivial or purely administrative conditions are not considered to be barriers. Donors and donees will need to consider whether stipulations in grant agreements, such as objectives and milestones, are measurable performance barriers or simply guidelines and mutually-agreed-upon goals. For a right of return to exist, it must be evident from the gift agreement or another document referred to in the gift agreement; its existence cannot simply be implied.

ASU 2014 – 09 (Topic 606)
ASU 2014-09  establishes a new model for all entities, nonprofits included, for recognizing revenue arising from contracts with customers (exchange transactions), and eliminates previous differences scattered throughout the Accounting Standards Codification. The new model consists of a five-step process as follows:

5 Step Process

The objective of the new model is to recognize revenue to depict the transfers of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Nonprofits will need to re-examine their contracts with customers to be sure they recognize the related revenues in accordance with this new standard. All program-related products or services for which a fee is charged, and all other sales of any goods or services, whether program-related or not, are subject to the new standard.

Eide Bailly can assist you with all aspects of your organization’s implementation of these new standards. Please contact a member of your Eide Bailly team today or one of our nonprofit professionals for help.

Latest Insights

March 25, 2019
Article
New rules designed to make it easier for the IRS to audit partnerships have also created new considerations for tax-exempt organizations entering into partnerships.
March 25, 2019
Article
Nonprofits are often a target for duplicated websites. Make sure your donors are giving to you and not an imposter.
March 25, 2019
Article
When it comes to compliance requirements, period of performance may seem simple, but there are a few pitfalls that must be avoided along the way.
March 21, 2019
Firm News
The union adds a new office and state to the regional CPA firm and adds additional ERP talent to their growing NetSuite practice.
January 18, 2019
Article
While having your audit team onsite can be stressful, there are certain steps you can take to reduce that stress and make the most of your audit.
January 14, 2019
Article
A proposed Accounting Standards Update may make some simplifying accounting alternatives available to nonprofits.
Find A Location