Insights: Article

OPEB for Employers is Being Implemented This Year: What You Need to Know

March 06, 2018

Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 75, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefits Other than Pensions (OPEB) (GASB-75) is in the process of being implemented by many state and local governments. For those governments that recently implemented the new pension standards, many of the provisions of GASB-75 are familiar. The actuarial valuation process is similar to pensions. The note disclosure and required supplementary information are also similar. But for many employers, there will be significant differences.

Major Differences Between Pensions and OPEB for Employers
The information being presented for OPEB will be different than pensions for many employers.

First, many employers have their own plans (known as single employer plans) rather than being members of a larger plan, such as a statewide retirement system (PERS). Therefore, much of the underlying data will be audited at the employer (or a health care plan or administrator contracted by the employer).

Second, OPEB may have been traditionally financed through ‘pay-as-you-go.’ In such a system, the employer reported any accumulated deficiencies in OPEB funding as compared to actuarially required (or determined) contributions. GASB-75 now requires reporting a liability in the Employer’s Statement of Net Position, representing the actuarially calculated total OPEB liability, less any assets that are accumulated in an irrevocable trust dedicated to the OPEB liability. This amount may be very different than the former net OPEB obligation.

Third, if the employer manages a single employer plan, the employer may have to reexamine what the employer has traditionally included as part of an OPEB amount (or if the employer should have presented as OPEB). (Multiple-employer plans may have more well-defined policies and procedures). In accordance with GASB-75, the majority of OPEB is related to retiree (not current employee) medical benefits. However, it also includes retiree vision, dental and similar benefits. In some cases, death benefits, long-term care insurance, disability and other forms of insurance or retirement benefits if provided separately from a pension plan are also OPEB. Termination benefits are not OPEB unless the termination has an effect on an OPEB benefit. An example of this would be if a government offers an early retirement incentive in the form of health care benefits for a specific period of time as a result of longevity of service. The incentive then extends preexisting retiree health care benefits to an earlier age, instead of at normal retirement age. Care must be taken in deciding what OPEB is in other circumstances. Activities such as workers’ compensation are not OPEB. Workers’ compensation is provided during an employee’s service.

Fourth, OPEB may be eliminated or curtailed if insurance is utilized. If the risk of providing benefits after employment for OPEB events is covered by the payment of insurance premiums, reporting of OPEB would be limited.  If an insured plan exists, risk also transfers to the insurer. In other situations, employers force retirees to subscribe to a Medicare plan upon eligibility. In such cases, the risk transfers to Medicare, potentially curtailing the employer’s exposure. This is commonly known as the “Medicare Toggle.”

Fifth, OPEB plan amendments can occur through legislation or contract at a far greater frequency than many pension plans. In some cases, changes to pensions requires a state constitutional amendment.

Finally, calculating an OPEB liability is highly dependent on medical claims costs, insurance rates and other plan-specific elements. The actuary considers a number of factors including:

  • Historical claims data
  • Historical health care premiums
  • Health care cost trends in the area (and nationally), including drug costs and formularies
  • Age-specific costs (in the case of geriatric-related illnesses)
  • Plan design

As medical costs and trends are volatile and must consider factors such as new research, technology, education about illnesses, even geographic location, in addition to age and other data, calculating an OPEB liability is far different than pensions.

Putting it All Together
If an employer has OPEB, the employer should have documentation regarding:

  • Plan provisions, eligibility, structure, constraints, contracts and legislation, and who at the employer is responsible for recordkeeping of such information
  • Benefits administration, including if a retiree files a claim—what is the process flow of the claim? The claims data will need sufficient documentation to leave an audit trail.
  • If the employer utilizes a single employer plan, if a trust is utilized, the value of the assets as of the measurement date (although no trust is required by GASB-75 nor is it required to be funded).
  • If the employer utilizes a single employer plan, details on the measurement date, valuation date and any decisions in process on changing benefits since the latest actuarial valuations.
  • Finally, if the employer is part of a multiple-employer plan, or a non-governmental plan, reports from those plans.

Eide Bailly is here to help you through this transition. Please feel free to contact an Eide Bailly professional at any time.

Latest Insights

September 18, 2018
As the largest tax reform legislation in the past 30 years becomes reality, it is important to stay up-to-date on planning opportunities and how reform may impact you and your business. Our Tax Reform: Practical Insights examples aim to break down…
September 18, 2018
Get ahead of tax season with the Eide Bailly Tax Planning Guide. A supplemental strategy guide to help guide year-end and make the tax laws work for you.
September 18, 2018
The SCOTUS Wayfair decision has prompted a new focus on state and local tax compliance. The decision to register, report, and comply is important.
September 17, 2018
When an IRS Letter 226J is received, it is important to respond timely and with accurate information to eliminate, abate or reduce IRS calculated penalties
September 17, 2018
Firm News
Tom Goekeler, partner at Eide Bailly LLP, has been named chief practice officer of the South Central region, which currently covers our Oklahoma and Texas offices.
September 17, 2018
The recent US Supreme Court decision that overturned Quill in the South Dakota v Wayfair case has many states making or considering law changes related to sales tax compliance for out-of-state sellers.
September 12, 2018
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, signed December 22, 2017, significantly impacted inbound tax planning. Non-U.S. taxpayers doing business in the U.S. will need to consider the new tax laws.
September 12, 2018
Applications have made a huge impact on our lives, allowing us to keep track of the complexities of our day-to-day and save for our futures. But it’s important to understand where we are laying our trust.
September 12, 2018
The following steps outline key considerations for businesses as they work to comply with the new sales and use tax rules.