Insights: Article

FASB ASUs (Fair Value, Inventory and Consolidation)

Effective for 2017 and Fiscal Year 2018 Financial Statements

By Tim McCutcheon

March 27, 2018

The Financial Accounting Standards Board’s 2009 codification of the accounting standards successfully organized the accounting content existing at that time, but it hasn’t slowed the continuing evolution of new standards and amendments. From the codification’s issuance through January 2018, FASB has issued nearly 150 Accounting Standards Updates (ASUs), with many more updates in various pre-issuance stages.

Trying to stay up to date with all the changes can be daunting. Nonprofits are subject to the vast majority of new ASUs and therefore must take steps to ensure they identify, understand, and properly apply new standards as they become effective. Here are several new ASUs applicable for calendar years ended Dec. 31, 2017, and fiscal years ending in 2018.

ASU 2015-07
Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent) (A Consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)

Many nonprofits have investments reported at fair value. The amendments in this ASU apply when the nonprofit elects to measure the fair value of certain investments using the net asset value per share practical expedient (NAV practical expedient). The ASU removes the requirement to categorize within the fair value hierarchy all investments for which fair value is measured using the NAV practical expedient. Although the amounts measured using the NAV practical expedient will no longer require leveling, they still must be presented within the hierarchy to permit reconciliation of the total amounts in the hierarchy to the amounts presented in the statement of financial position.

ASU 2015-11
Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory

Nonprofits often maintain inventories of mission-related items. For example, a museum gift shop maintains a variety of products related to its collections and also for the comfort and convenience of its visitors; a food bank maintains food stores in its warehouse; and a college book store maintains textbooks and supplies for students and faculty. ASU 2015-11 establishes a single measurement method for all inventory except that which is measured using the Last-In, First-Out (LIFO) or the retail inventory method.

All other inventory, which includes inventory that is measured using either First-In, First-Out (FIFO) or average cost, must be measured at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation.

ASU 2017-02
Not-for-Profit Entities—Consolidation (Subtopic 958-810): Clarifying When a Not-for- Profit Entity That Is A General Partner or a Limited Partner Should Consolidate a For-Profit Limited Partnership or Similar Entity.

Nonprofits use a variety of entity structures, including limited partnerships (LPs) and limited liability corporations (LLCs), to conduct activities such as the management of housing projects, facility construction and/or operations, and certain programmatic and ancillary activities. ASU 2017-02 provides clarity for nonprofit consolidation of these entities in response to confusion that arose after the issuance of ASU 2015-02, Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis.

ASU 2015-02 removed the presumption that a general partner controls and, therefore, should consolidate a for-profit limited partnership or similar entity. Instead, ASU 2015-02 required a nonprofit general partner to apply the consolidation guidance applicable to variable interest entities before applying the general consolidation guidance. However, because NFPs generally are excluded from the variable interest entities guidance, the question of when a nonprofit general partner should consolidate a for-profit limited partnership was left unanswered.

ASU 2017-02 updates the nonprofit consolidation guidance to now include both limited and general partner ownership arrangements. General partner nonprofits are presumed to control a for-profit limited partnership regardless of ownership interest, unless that presumption is overcome by virtue of the limited partners having either substantive kick-out or participating rights. To be considered substantive, kick-out rights must be exercisable by a simple majority vote of the limited partners, or a lower threshold.

The transition guidelines under ASU 2017-02 require entities that have not yet adopted ASU 2015-02 to adopt this ASU at the same time, using the same transition method elected for ASU 2015-02. Nonprofits that already have adopted ASU 2015-02 are required to apply the amendments in this ASU retrospectively to all relevant prior periods, starting with the fiscal year in which ASU 2015-02 was initially applied.

Please contact any member of your Eide Bailly service team to discuss your specific circumstances and how these new standards will apply to your nonprofit organization.

Future articles will address new standards for revenue recognition and leases. More to come!

Latest Insights

September 18, 2018
Article
As the largest tax reform legislation in the past 30 years becomes reality, it is important to stay up-to-date on planning opportunities and how reform may impact you and your business. Our Tax Reform: Practical Insights examples aim to break down…
September 18, 2018
Tool
Get ahead of tax season with the Eide Bailly Tax Planning Guide. A supplemental strategy guide to help guide year-end and make the tax laws work for you.
September 18, 2018
Article
The SCOTUS Wayfair decision has prompted a new focus on state and local tax compliance. The decision to register, report, and comply is important.
September 17, 2018
Article
When an IRS Letter 226J is received, it is important to respond timely and with accurate information to eliminate, abate or reduce IRS calculated penalties
September 17, 2018
Firm News
Tom Goekeler, partner at Eide Bailly LLP, has been named chief practice officer of the South Central region, which currently covers our Oklahoma and Texas offices.
September 17, 2018
Article
The recent US Supreme Court decision that overturned Quill in the South Dakota v Wayfair case has many states making or considering law changes related to sales tax compliance for out-of-state sellers.
September 12, 2018
Article
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, signed December 22, 2017, significantly impacted inbound tax planning. Non-U.S. taxpayers doing business in the U.S. will need to consider the new tax laws.
September 12, 2018
Article
Applications have made a huge impact on our lives, allowing us to keep track of the complexities of our day-to-day and save for our futures. But it’s important to understand where we are laying our trust.
September 12, 2018
Article
The following steps outline key considerations for businesses as they work to comply with the new sales and use tax rules.