Insights: Article

Tax Court Case Proves Good Intentions Can Have Bad Results

July 12, 2017

A recent U.S. Tax Court decision illustrates the sometimes limited value of "good intentions."

In Summers, TC Memo 2017-125, a young couple decided to save money and amicably work out their own divorce agreement without obtaining tax or legal advice. As part of their plan, the husband took a distribution from his IRA and gave half of it to his soon to be ex-wife so she could pay some personal debts prior to finalizing the divorce. 

'Additional Tax' on Early Distributions
Generally, distributions from retirement plans, including IRAs, are fully taxable as ordinary income (unless rolled over to another qualified retirement plan or IRA). Distributions that occur before certain dates can also result in a 10 percent additional tax unless a specific exception applies. For example, one of these exceptions can apply when an "early" retirement plan distribution, otherwise subject to the additional tax, is made to a spouse or former spouse under a qualified judgment, decree or order of a state court.

The taxpayer in the Summers case felt he met the "spirit" of this exception. However, he failed to follow requirements set forth in the tax law because: 

  • The distribution from his IRA was made prior to a state court's decree dissolving the marriage
  • The distribution was not paid directly to the former spouse

Consequently, the IRS assessed additional tax equal to 10 percent of the IRA distribution.

IRS Wins
The Tax Court expressed "considerable sympathy" for the taxpayer's position. However, his failure to comply with the statutory requirements for an exception to the 10 percent additional tax compelled the court to agree with the IRS's assessment.

Plan Ahead
This result serves as a reminder of the value of professional advice in advance of entering into financial transactions. With proper planning, it is possible the couple in this case could have achieved an acceptable financial result and reduced significantly the husband's income tax consequences.

Should you want to discuss any proposed personal or business transactions, review their tax consequences and consider planning alternatives, contact your Eide Bailly tax professional. 

Latest Insights

November 16, 2018
If your business sells or operates in more than one state, it’s important to understand the concept of nexus. Depending on how you’re earning revenue, having nexus could impose a variety of taxes, which vary state to state. Learn more in our…
November 15, 2018
Until recently, many businesses weren’t overly concerned about sales tax. They knew they needed to collect and remit in the state in which they resided, but beyond that, their compliance burden was limited.
November 12, 2018
This insight explores what dealerships can expect from the proposed section 199A regulations under tax reform.
November 8, 2018
Are you a business taxpayer with annual gross receipts of $25 Million or less? If so, you may be eligible to take advantage of new Small Taxpayer Safe Harbors that could generate significant tax savings and simplify your tax returns in future years!
November 8, 2018
Considered the most significant tax code overhaul in over three decades, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act passed in 2017 includes provisions affecting both individuals and businesses.
November 7, 2018
Recorded Webinar
State and local sales tax compliance is always evolving, making it important to stay up-to-date on changes affecting your tax liability and responsibilities. This session will cover what you need to know regarding the recently enacted state and…
November 7, 2018
“Why is my portfolio underperforming the market?” This question may be on your mind.
November 5, 2018
Identify your implementation methodology. There are four practical expedients available. We'll explore each option.
November 5, 2018
Deeper dive into ASU 2016 liquidity.